1 Citationer (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives
To describe and synthesise literature on clinical decision-making within diagnostic radiography, to uncover the important elements, and to identify knowledge gaps for further investigation. The scoping review question was: How do diagnostic radiographers make clinical decisions?

Key findings
Radiographers make clinical decisions before, during and after examinations. The primary source of information radiographers use is the clinical request, however, if they doubt something, they rely on their colleague's points of view rather than evidence-based practice. Many elements must be considered in the clinical decision-making process; however, lack of autonomy, sparse information on the clinical requests, and lack of time affect the process, which can lead to a barrier to effective decision-making.

Conclusion
Clinical decisions are made based on many different elements before, during, and after examinations in combination with different types of knowledge, as well as technical and organisational aspects within radiography clinical practice.

Implication for practice
There is a need to focus on giving more attention to developing the decision-making elements. In addition, there must be more focus on improving intra-professional work between radiographers and radiologists to facilitate radiographers' opportunities to act on their clinical decisions.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRadiography
Vol/bind30
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1136-1143
Antal sider8
ISSN1078-8174
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jul. 2024

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Clinical decisions-making within diagnostic radiography - A scoping review'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater