Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software: Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

372 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

 
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedAalborg
ForlagDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University
Antal sider241
StatusUdgivet - 2007
NavnDCE Technical reports
Nummer24

Fingerprint

Facades
Skin
Flow rate
Cooling
Heating
Air
Temperature

Emneord

  • Double Skind Facades
  • Comparative Test Cases

Citer dette

Kalyanova, O., & Heiselberg, P. (2007). Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software: Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report. Aalborg: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University. DCE Technical reports, Nr. 24
Kalyanova, Olena ; Heiselberg, Per. / Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software : Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report. Aalborg : Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2007. 241 s. (DCE Technical reports; Nr. 24).
@book{bfef2f4066a611dcb338000ea68e967b,
title = "Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software: Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report",
abstract = "The scope of this subtask is to perform a comparative validation of the building simulation software for the buildings with the double skin fa{\cc}ade. The outline of the results in the comparative validation identifies the areas where is no correspondence achieved, i.e. calculation of the air flow rate, surface temperatures heating load at night and cooling load in the peaks of solar gains etc. Meanwhile, the comparative exercises have built a strong foundation for the empirical test cases. Two main empirical test cases were identified, these correspond to the comparative test case DSF100_2 and DSF200_4, the third empirical test case is also specified as DSF400_3, but it's completion is under consideration. The comparative test cases can not be directly used for the validation of the software due to often disagreement of the results, however the result of the exercises is that the comparative validation can be regarded as the main argument to continue the validation of the building simulation software for the buildings with the double skin fa{\cc}ade with the empirical validation test cases.",
keywords = "Comparative Test Cases, Double Skin Facades, Double Skind Facades, Comparative Test Cases",
author = "Olena Kalyanova and Per Heiselberg",
note = "This report is a product of a joint effort between International Energy Agency Solar Heating and Cooling (IEA SHC) Task 34 and Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems (ECBCS) Annex 43. Ron Judkoff of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) was the Operating Agent for IEA 34/43 on behalf of the United States Department of Energy.",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
series = "DCE Technical reports",
publisher = "Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University",
number = "24",
address = "Denmark",

}

Kalyanova, O & Heiselberg, P 2007, Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software: Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report. DCE Technical reports, nr. 24, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg.

Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software : Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report. / Kalyanova, Olena; Heiselberg, Per.

Aalborg : Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2007. 241 s. (DCE Technical reports; Nr. 24).

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

TY - RPRT

T1 - Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software

T2 - Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report

AU - Kalyanova, Olena

AU - Heiselberg, Per

N1 - This report is a product of a joint effort between International Energy Agency Solar Heating and Cooling (IEA SHC) Task 34 and Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems (ECBCS) Annex 43. Ron Judkoff of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) was the Operating Agent for IEA 34/43 on behalf of the United States Department of Energy.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The scope of this subtask is to perform a comparative validation of the building simulation software for the buildings with the double skin façade. The outline of the results in the comparative validation identifies the areas where is no correspondence achieved, i.e. calculation of the air flow rate, surface temperatures heating load at night and cooling load in the peaks of solar gains etc. Meanwhile, the comparative exercises have built a strong foundation for the empirical test cases. Two main empirical test cases were identified, these correspond to the comparative test case DSF100_2 and DSF200_4, the third empirical test case is also specified as DSF400_3, but it's completion is under consideration. The comparative test cases can not be directly used for the validation of the software due to often disagreement of the results, however the result of the exercises is that the comparative validation can be regarded as the main argument to continue the validation of the building simulation software for the buildings with the double skin façade with the empirical validation test cases.

AB - The scope of this subtask is to perform a comparative validation of the building simulation software for the buildings with the double skin façade. The outline of the results in the comparative validation identifies the areas where is no correspondence achieved, i.e. calculation of the air flow rate, surface temperatures heating load at night and cooling load in the peaks of solar gains etc. Meanwhile, the comparative exercises have built a strong foundation for the empirical test cases. Two main empirical test cases were identified, these correspond to the comparative test case DSF100_2 and DSF200_4, the third empirical test case is also specified as DSF400_3, but it's completion is under consideration. The comparative test cases can not be directly used for the validation of the software due to often disagreement of the results, however the result of the exercises is that the comparative validation can be regarded as the main argument to continue the validation of the building simulation software for the buildings with the double skin façade with the empirical validation test cases.

KW - Comparative Test Cases

KW - Double Skin Facades

KW - Double Skind Facades

KW - Comparative Test Cases

M3 - Report

T3 - DCE Technical reports

BT - Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software

PB - Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University

CY - Aalborg

ER -

Kalyanova O, Heiselberg P. Comparative Validation of Building Simulation Software: Modeling of Double Facades : Final Report. Aalborg: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2007. 241 s. (DCE Technical reports; Nr. 24).