Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals

Line Ørtoft Endelt, Anders la Cour-Harbo

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

3 Citationer (Scopus)
336 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Within the last few decades a number of new signal processing tools has appeared. These have mainly been compared using constructed signals, signals designed to show the advantage of a new method over already existing methods. In this paper we evaluate the methods Basis Pursuit, Minimum Fuel Neural Networks, Matching Pursuit, Best Orthogonal Basis, Alternating Projections and Methods of Frames on “real” signals. The methods are applied on a number of excerpts sampled from a small collection of music, and their ability to expresmusic signals in a sparse manner is evaluated. The sparseness is measured by a number of sparseness measures and results are shown on the ℓ1 norm of the coefficients, using a dictionary containing a Dirac basis, a Discrete Cosine Transform, and a Wavelet Packet. Evaluated only on the sparseness Matching Pursuit is the best method, and it is also relatively fast.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3
Antal sider4
Publikationsdato2005
StatusUdgivet - 2005
BegivenhedICASSP 2005 - Philadelphia, USA
Varighed: 18 mar. 200523 mar. 2005

Konference

KonferenceICASSP 2005
LandUSA
ByPhiladelphia
Periode18/03/200523/03/2005

Fingerprint

Discrete cosine transforms
Glossaries
Signal processing
Neural networks

Citer dette

Endelt, L. Ø., & la Cour-Harbo, A. (2005). Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals. I IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3
Endelt, Line Ørtoft ; la Cour-Harbo, Anders. / Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3. 2005.
@inproceedings{0cc01d609c2d11db8ed6000ea68e967b,
title = "Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals",
abstract = "Within the last few decades a number of new signal processing tools has appeared. These have mainly been compared using constructed signals, signals designed to show the advantage of a new method over already existing methods. In this paper we evaluate the methods Basis Pursuit, Minimum Fuel Neural Networks, Matching Pursuit, Best Orthogonal Basis, Alternating Projections and Methods of Frames on “real” signals. The methods are applied on a number of excerpts sampled from a small collection of music, and their ability to expresmusic signals in a sparse manner is evaluated. The sparseness is measured by a number of sparseness measures and results are shown on the ℓ1 norm of the coefficients, using a dictionary containing a Dirac basis, a Discrete Cosine Transform, and a Wavelet Packet. Evaluated only on the sparseness Matching Pursuit is the best method, and it is also relatively fast.",
author = "Endelt, {Line {\O}rtoft} and {la Cour-Harbo}, Anders",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
booktitle = "IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3",

}

Endelt, LØ & la Cour-Harbo, A 2005, Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals. i IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3. ICASSP 2005, Philadelphia, USA, 18/03/2005.

Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals. / Endelt, Line Ørtoft; la Cour-Harbo, Anders.

IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3. 2005.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals

AU - Endelt, Line Ørtoft

AU - la Cour-Harbo, Anders

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Within the last few decades a number of new signal processing tools has appeared. These have mainly been compared using constructed signals, signals designed to show the advantage of a new method over already existing methods. In this paper we evaluate the methods Basis Pursuit, Minimum Fuel Neural Networks, Matching Pursuit, Best Orthogonal Basis, Alternating Projections and Methods of Frames on “real” signals. The methods are applied on a number of excerpts sampled from a small collection of music, and their ability to expresmusic signals in a sparse manner is evaluated. The sparseness is measured by a number of sparseness measures and results are shown on the ℓ1 norm of the coefficients, using a dictionary containing a Dirac basis, a Discrete Cosine Transform, and a Wavelet Packet. Evaluated only on the sparseness Matching Pursuit is the best method, and it is also relatively fast.

AB - Within the last few decades a number of new signal processing tools has appeared. These have mainly been compared using constructed signals, signals designed to show the advantage of a new method over already existing methods. In this paper we evaluate the methods Basis Pursuit, Minimum Fuel Neural Networks, Matching Pursuit, Best Orthogonal Basis, Alternating Projections and Methods of Frames on “real” signals. The methods are applied on a number of excerpts sampled from a small collection of music, and their ability to expresmusic signals in a sparse manner is evaluated. The sparseness is measured by a number of sparseness measures and results are shown on the ℓ1 norm of the coefficients, using a dictionary containing a Dirac basis, a Discrete Cosine Transform, and a Wavelet Packet. Evaluated only on the sparseness Matching Pursuit is the best method, and it is also relatively fast.

M3 - Article in proceeding

BT - IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3

ER -

Endelt LØ, la Cour-Harbo A. Comparison of Methods for Sparse Representation of Musical Signals. I IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). Vol. 3. 2005