Conceptualising temporary use amongst development and regeneration processes: A model applied to the development industry in two British Cities

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Drawing on empirical research in Bristol and Liverpool, this paper examines the role of temporary solutions within circular land (re)development processes. It establishes a conceptualisation on interim use within the ‘development pipeline’ in which fluctuating externalities and three interrelating variables – time, risk and value – are revealed to influence the temporary utilisation of land/property by the development industry. Exemplified through two regeneration initiatives, cases show how delimited timeframes and risk-shifting strategies commonly leave temporary projects without commensurate reward. Extrapolating to the larger field of urban design, the discussion advances the emerging rationale that temporary development should be understood as an integral part of the development process.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Urban Design
ISSN1357-4809
StatusUnder udarbejdelse - 2019

Fingerprint

Regeneration
Industry
Development process
Rationale
Liverpool
Risk-shifting
Conceptualization
Integral
Reward
Redevelopment
Empirical research
Externalities

Emneord

    Citer dette

    @article{3224aeebc75a439cb66a0465f85eee60,
    title = "Conceptualising temporary use amongst development and regeneration processes: A model applied to the development industry in two British Cities",
    abstract = "Drawing on empirical research in Bristol and Liverpool, this paper examines the role of temporary solutions within circular land (re)development processes. It establishes a conceptualisation on interim use within the ‘development pipeline’ in which fluctuating externalities and three interrelating variables – time, risk and value – are revealed to influence the temporary utilisation of land/property by the development industry. Exemplified through two regeneration initiatives, cases show how delimited timeframes and risk-shifting strategies commonly leave temporary projects without commensurate reward. Extrapolating to the larger field of urban design, the discussion advances the emerging rationale that temporary development should be understood as an integral part of the development process.",
    keywords = "temporary use, the development process, regeneration, vacant land, England",
    author = "Michael Martin",
    year = "2019",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Journal of Urban Design",
    issn = "1357-4809",
    publisher = "Routledge",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Conceptualising temporary use amongst development and regeneration processes: A model applied to the development industry in two British Cities

    AU - Martin, Michael

    PY - 2019

    Y1 - 2019

    N2 - Drawing on empirical research in Bristol and Liverpool, this paper examines the role of temporary solutions within circular land (re)development processes. It establishes a conceptualisation on interim use within the ‘development pipeline’ in which fluctuating externalities and three interrelating variables – time, risk and value – are revealed to influence the temporary utilisation of land/property by the development industry. Exemplified through two regeneration initiatives, cases show how delimited timeframes and risk-shifting strategies commonly leave temporary projects without commensurate reward. Extrapolating to the larger field of urban design, the discussion advances the emerging rationale that temporary development should be understood as an integral part of the development process.

    AB - Drawing on empirical research in Bristol and Liverpool, this paper examines the role of temporary solutions within circular land (re)development processes. It establishes a conceptualisation on interim use within the ‘development pipeline’ in which fluctuating externalities and three interrelating variables – time, risk and value – are revealed to influence the temporary utilisation of land/property by the development industry. Exemplified through two regeneration initiatives, cases show how delimited timeframes and risk-shifting strategies commonly leave temporary projects without commensurate reward. Extrapolating to the larger field of urban design, the discussion advances the emerging rationale that temporary development should be understood as an integral part of the development process.

    KW - temporary use

    KW - the development process

    KW - regeneration

    KW - vacant land

    KW - England

    M3 - Journal article

    JO - Journal of Urban Design

    JF - Journal of Urban Design

    SN - 1357-4809

    ER -