TY - JOUR
T1 - Cut-Off Values Able to Identify Migraine Patients With Increased Pressure-Pain Sensitivity Independent of the Migraine Cycle Through a Single Assessment
T2 - A Secondary Analysis of a Multicentre, Cross-Sectional, Observational Study
AU - Castaldo, Matteo
AU - Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
AU - Ponzano, Marta
AU - Bovis, Francesca
AU - Torelli, Paola
AU - Finocchi, Cinzia
AU - Di Antonio, Stefano
N1 - © 2025 The Author(s). European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC ®.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - AIM: Identify values that could predict the presence of increased pressure-pain sensitivity independent of the migraine cycle through a single assessment.METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a previous study in which 198 episodic and chronic migraine patients were assessed during all phases of the migraine cycle. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was assessed over the temporalis, cervical spine, hand, and leg. Migraine patients were divided into two sub-groups: patients with increased pressure-pain sensitivity (IPS) and with No IPS (No-IPS). A Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection decision tree analysis was used to identify predictors to be included in the IPS or NoIPS group. To assess the internal validity of the model, a tenfold cross-validation was applied.RESULTS: 161 (81%) patients were included in the IPS group, while 37 (19%) in the NoIPS group. Migraine patients with: (1) Temporalis PPT ≤ 130 kPa; (2) Temporalis PPT > 130 kPa and ≤ 197.5 kPa and hand PPT ≤ 347.33 kPa; (3) Temporalis PPT > 197.5 kPa and hand PPT ≤ 315 kPa; were correctly included in the IPS group with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 81%, a positive predictive value of 96%, and a negative predictive value of 81%. The accuracy of the model and the cross-validation analysis were respectively 93% and 92%.CONCLUSION: The high internal validity suggests that our model could precisely predict the presence of IPS independently by the phase in which the assessment occurred. Trigeminal and hand PPT cut-off values could be used to identify patients with IPS.
AB - AIM: Identify values that could predict the presence of increased pressure-pain sensitivity independent of the migraine cycle through a single assessment.METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a previous study in which 198 episodic and chronic migraine patients were assessed during all phases of the migraine cycle. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was assessed over the temporalis, cervical spine, hand, and leg. Migraine patients were divided into two sub-groups: patients with increased pressure-pain sensitivity (IPS) and with No IPS (No-IPS). A Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection decision tree analysis was used to identify predictors to be included in the IPS or NoIPS group. To assess the internal validity of the model, a tenfold cross-validation was applied.RESULTS: 161 (81%) patients were included in the IPS group, while 37 (19%) in the NoIPS group. Migraine patients with: (1) Temporalis PPT ≤ 130 kPa; (2) Temporalis PPT > 130 kPa and ≤ 197.5 kPa and hand PPT ≤ 347.33 kPa; (3) Temporalis PPT > 197.5 kPa and hand PPT ≤ 315 kPa; were correctly included in the IPS group with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 81%, a positive predictive value of 96%, and a negative predictive value of 81%. The accuracy of the model and the cross-validation analysis were respectively 93% and 92%.CONCLUSION: The high internal validity suggests that our model could precisely predict the presence of IPS independently by the phase in which the assessment occurred. Trigeminal and hand PPT cut-off values could be used to identify patients with IPS.
KW - Adult
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Migraine Disorders/diagnosis
KW - Pain Measurement/methods
KW - Pain Threshold/physiology
KW - Pressure
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - migraine
KW - sensory profiling
KW - sensitisation
KW - pressure pain threshold
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215371300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejp.4787
DO - 10.1002/ejp.4787
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39836392
SN - 1090-3801
VL - 29
JO - European Journal of Pain
JF - European Journal of Pain
IS - 2
M1 - e4787
ER -