Darwin's Perplexing Paradox: Intelligent Design in Nature

Steinar Thorvaldsen, Peter Øhrstrøm

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Today, many would assume that Charles Darwin absolutely rejected any claim of intelligent design in nature. However, review of his initial writings reveals that Darwin accepted some aspects of this view. His conceptualization of design was founded on both the cosmological and the teleological ideas from classical natural theology. When Darwin discovered the dynamic process of natural selection, he rejected the old teleological argument as formulated by William Paley. However, he was never able to ignore the powerful experience of the beauty and complexity of an intelligently designed universe, as a whole. He corresponded with Asa Gray on religious themes, particularly touching the problem of pain and intelligent design in nature. The term “intelligent design” was probably introduced by William Whewell. Principally for theological and philosophical reasons, Darwin could only accept the concept for the universe as a whole, not with respect to individual elements of the living world.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPerspectives in Biology and Medicine
Vol/bind56
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)78-98
Antal sider21
ISSN0031-5982
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Citer dette

@article{d7f1827c7fc640ef91f9f9f9b2991402,
title = "Darwin's Perplexing Paradox: Intelligent Design in Nature",
abstract = "Today, many would assume that Charles Darwin absolutely rejected any claim of intelligent design in nature. However, review of his initial writings reveals that Darwin accepted some aspects of this view. His conceptualization of design was founded on both the cosmological and the teleological ideas from classical natural theology. When Darwin discovered the dynamic process of natural selection, he rejected the old teleological argument as formulated by William Paley. However, he was never able to ignore the powerful experience of the beauty and complexity of an intelligently designed universe, as a whole. He corresponded with Asa Gray on religious themes, particularly touching the problem of pain and intelligent design in nature. The term “intelligent design” was probably introduced by William Whewell. Principally for theological and philosophical reasons, Darwin could only accept the concept for the universe as a whole, not with respect to individual elements of the living world.",
author = "Steinar Thorvaldsen and Peter {\O}hrstr{\o}m",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1353/pbm.2013.0000",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "78--98",
journal = "Perspectives in Biology and Medicine",
issn = "0031-5982",
publisher = "TheJohns Hopkins University Press",
number = "1",

}

Darwin's Perplexing Paradox : Intelligent Design in Nature. / Thorvaldsen, Steinar; Øhrstrøm, Peter.

I: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Bind 56, Nr. 1, 2013, s. 78-98.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Darwin's Perplexing Paradox

T2 - Intelligent Design in Nature

AU - Thorvaldsen, Steinar

AU - Øhrstrøm, Peter

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Today, many would assume that Charles Darwin absolutely rejected any claim of intelligent design in nature. However, review of his initial writings reveals that Darwin accepted some aspects of this view. His conceptualization of design was founded on both the cosmological and the teleological ideas from classical natural theology. When Darwin discovered the dynamic process of natural selection, he rejected the old teleological argument as formulated by William Paley. However, he was never able to ignore the powerful experience of the beauty and complexity of an intelligently designed universe, as a whole. He corresponded with Asa Gray on religious themes, particularly touching the problem of pain and intelligent design in nature. The term “intelligent design” was probably introduced by William Whewell. Principally for theological and philosophical reasons, Darwin could only accept the concept for the universe as a whole, not with respect to individual elements of the living world.

AB - Today, many would assume that Charles Darwin absolutely rejected any claim of intelligent design in nature. However, review of his initial writings reveals that Darwin accepted some aspects of this view. His conceptualization of design was founded on both the cosmological and the teleological ideas from classical natural theology. When Darwin discovered the dynamic process of natural selection, he rejected the old teleological argument as formulated by William Paley. However, he was never able to ignore the powerful experience of the beauty and complexity of an intelligently designed universe, as a whole. He corresponded with Asa Gray on religious themes, particularly touching the problem of pain and intelligent design in nature. The term “intelligent design” was probably introduced by William Whewell. Principally for theological and philosophical reasons, Darwin could only accept the concept for the universe as a whole, not with respect to individual elements of the living world.

U2 - 10.1353/pbm.2013.0000

DO - 10.1353/pbm.2013.0000

M3 - Journal article

VL - 56

SP - 78

EP - 98

JO - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

JF - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

SN - 0031-5982

IS - 1

ER -