Resumé
This article is based on a longitudinal empirical survey-study (2010-2016). 4.339 engineering students from 104 different study programs at eight Danish universities and Schools of Engineering have participated in this study. We use data from a Research Council Project called PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark), as well as the follow-up study PROCEED-2-work.
The findings show that engineering students in sustainability programmes express significantly lower self-confidence and they are significantly more uncertain about their abilities to perform well with regard to math and science tasks than engineering students in non-sustainability programmes. However, students within sustainability science also rate themselves in the beginning of their study to be significantly more skilled in terms of solving problems that have multiple solutions, and they rate their ability to work across disciplines significantly higher than their fellow students at the end of their study. Thereby there are clear and mutual potentials for cross-fertilisation by making students from sustainability science work with students from other disciplines.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018 : Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence |
| Redaktører | Robin Clark, Peter Munkebo Hussmann, Hannu-Matti Järvinen , Mike Murphy, Martin Etchells Vigild |
| Antal sider | 9 |
| Forlag | SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education |
| Publikationsdato | sep. 2018 |
| Sider | 437-445 |
| ISBN (Elektronisk) | 978-2-87352-016-8 |
| Status | Udgivet - sep. 2018 |
| Begivenhed | 46th SEFI Annual Conference: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence - DTU , København, Danmark Varighed: 17 sep. 2018 → 21 sep. 2018 Konferencens nummer: 46 http://www.sefi2018.eu/ |
Konference
| Konference | 46th SEFI Annual Conference |
|---|---|
| Nummer | 46 |
| Lokation | DTU |
| Land | Danmark |
| By | København |
| Periode | 17/09/2018 → 21/09/2018 |
| Internetadresse |
Fingerprint
Citer dette
}
Educating Engineers for Sustainability : understanding student differences. / Smink, Carla Kornelia; Holgaard, Jette Egelund; Clausen, Nicolaj Riise; Kolmos, Anette.
Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence . red. / Robin Clark; Peter Munkebo Hussmann; Hannu-Matti Järvinen ; Mike Murphy; Martin Etchells Vigild . SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education, 2018. s. 437-445.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceeding › Konferenceartikel i proceeding › Forskning › peer review
TY - GEN
T1 - Educating Engineers for Sustainability
T2 - understanding student differences
AU - Smink, Carla Kornelia
AU - Holgaard, Jette Egelund
AU - Clausen, Nicolaj Riise
AU - Kolmos, Anette
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Embedding sustainability in engineering education includes a potential to interrelate programmes with a specific focus on sustainability science, with other engineering programmes. In this paper, we explore how engineering students from sustainability science and other disciplines could benefit by working together already during their line of study. We will investigate the differences in the level of preparedness between engineering students in non-sustainability programmes and engineering students in sustainability programmes when they start their education and when they finish their studies.This article is based on a longitudinal empirical survey-study (2010-2016). 4.339 engineering students from 104 different study programs at eight Danish universities and Schools of Engineering have participated in this study. We use data from a Research Council Project called PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark), as well as the follow-up study PROCEED-2-work.The findings show that engineering students in sustainability programmes express significantly lower self-confidence and they are significantly more uncertain about their abilities to perform well with regard to math and science tasks than engineering students in non-sustainability programmes. However, students within sustainability science also rate themselves in the beginning of their study to be significantly more skilled in terms of solving problems that have multiple solutions, and they rate their ability to work across disciplines significantly higher than their fellow students at the end of their study. Thereby there are clear and mutual potentials for cross-fertilisation by making students from sustainability science work with students from other disciplines.
AB - Embedding sustainability in engineering education includes a potential to interrelate programmes with a specific focus on sustainability science, with other engineering programmes. In this paper, we explore how engineering students from sustainability science and other disciplines could benefit by working together already during their line of study. We will investigate the differences in the level of preparedness between engineering students in non-sustainability programmes and engineering students in sustainability programmes when they start their education and when they finish their studies.This article is based on a longitudinal empirical survey-study (2010-2016). 4.339 engineering students from 104 different study programs at eight Danish universities and Schools of Engineering have participated in this study. We use data from a Research Council Project called PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark), as well as the follow-up study PROCEED-2-work.The findings show that engineering students in sustainability programmes express significantly lower self-confidence and they are significantly more uncertain about their abilities to perform well with regard to math and science tasks than engineering students in non-sustainability programmes. However, students within sustainability science also rate themselves in the beginning of their study to be significantly more skilled in terms of solving problems that have multiple solutions, and they rate their ability to work across disciplines significantly higher than their fellow students at the end of their study. Thereby there are clear and mutual potentials for cross-fertilisation by making students from sustainability science work with students from other disciplines.
UR - https://www.sefi.be/?post_type=proceedings
M3 - Article in proceeding
SP - 437
EP - 445
BT - Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018
A2 - Clark, Robin
A2 - Hussmann, Peter Munkebo
A2 - Järvinen , Hannu-Matti
A2 - Murphy, Mike
A2 - Vigild , Martin Etchells
PB - SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education
ER -