Educating Engineers for Sustainability: understanding student differences

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Embedding sustainability in engineering education includes a potential to interrelate programmes with a specific focus on sustainability science, with other engineering programmes. In this paper, we explore how engineering students from sustainability science and other disciplines could benefit by working together already during their line of study. We will investigate the differences in the level of preparedness between engineering students in non-sustainability programmes and engineering students in sustainability programmes when they start their education and when they finish their studies.

This article is based on a longitudinal empirical survey-study (2010-2016). 4.339 engineering students from 104 different study programs at eight Danish universities and Schools of Engineering have participated in this study. We use data from a Research Council Project called PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark), as well as the follow-up study PROCEED-2-work.

The findings show that engineering students in sustainability programmes express significantly lower self-confidence and they are significantly more uncertain about their abilities to perform well with regard to math and science tasks than engineering students in non-sustainability programmes. However, students within sustainability science also rate themselves in the beginning of their study to be significantly more skilled in terms of solving problems that have multiple solutions, and they rate their ability to work across disciplines significantly higher than their fellow students at the end of their study. Thereby there are clear and mutual potentials for cross-fertilisation by making students from sustainability science work with students from other disciplines.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelProceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018 : Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence
RedaktørerRobin Clark, Peter Munkebo Hussmann, Hannu-Matti Järvinen , Mike Murphy, Martin Etchells Vigild
Antal sider9
ForlagSEFI: European Association for Engineering Education
Publikationsdatosep. 2018
Sider437-445
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-2-87352-016-8
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2018
Begivenhed46th SEFI Annual Conference: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence - DTU , København, Danmark
Varighed: 17 sep. 201821 sep. 2018
Konferencens nummer: 46
http://www.sefi2018.eu/

Konference

Konference46th SEFI Annual Conference
Nummer46
LokationDTU
LandDanmark
ByKøbenhavn
Periode17/09/201821/09/2018
Internetadresse

Fingerprint

engineer
sustainability
engineering
student
science
Denmark
education
program of study
study program
self-confidence
ability
university

Citer dette

Smink, C. K., Holgaard, J. E., Clausen, N. R., & Kolmos, A. (2018). Educating Engineers for Sustainability: understanding student differences. I R. Clark, P. M. Hussmann, H-M. Järvinen , M. Murphy, & M. E. Vigild (red.), Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence (s. 437-445). SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education.
Smink, Carla Kornelia ; Holgaard, Jette Egelund ; Clausen, Nicolaj Riise ; Kolmos, Anette. / Educating Engineers for Sustainability : understanding student differences. Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence . red. / Robin Clark ; Peter Munkebo Hussmann ; Hannu-Matti Järvinen ; Mike Murphy ; Martin Etchells Vigild . SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education, 2018. s. 437-445
@inproceedings{d93633f69157493dba4c2544d0b818da,
title = "Educating Engineers for Sustainability: understanding student differences",
abstract = "Embedding sustainability in engineering education includes a potential to interrelate programmes with a specific focus on sustainability science, with other engineering programmes. In this paper, we explore how engineering students from sustainability science and other disciplines could benefit by working together already during their line of study. We will investigate the differences in the level of preparedness between engineering students in non-sustainability programmes and engineering students in sustainability programmes when they start their education and when they finish their studies.This article is based on a longitudinal empirical survey-study (2010-2016). 4.339 engineering students from 104 different study programs at eight Danish universities and Schools of Engineering have participated in this study. We use data from a Research Council Project called PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark), as well as the follow-up study PROCEED-2-work.The findings show that engineering students in sustainability programmes express significantly lower self-confidence and they are significantly more uncertain about their abilities to perform well with regard to math and science tasks than engineering students in non-sustainability programmes. However, students within sustainability science also rate themselves in the beginning of their study to be significantly more skilled in terms of solving problems that have multiple solutions, and they rate their ability to work across disciplines significantly higher than their fellow students at the end of their study. Thereby there are clear and mutual potentials for cross-fertilisation by making students from sustainability science work with students from other disciplines.",
author = "Smink, {Carla Kornelia} and Holgaard, {Jette Egelund} and Clausen, {Nicolaj Riise} and Anette Kolmos",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
language = "English",
pages = "437--445",
editor = "Clark, {Robin } and Hussmann, {Peter Munkebo} and {J{\"a}rvinen }, Hannu-Matti and Murphy, {Mike } and {Vigild }, {Martin Etchells }",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018",
publisher = "SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education",

}

Smink, CK, Holgaard, JE, Clausen, NR & Kolmos, A 2018, Educating Engineers for Sustainability: understanding student differences. i R Clark, PM Hussmann, H-M Järvinen , M Murphy & ME Vigild (red), Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence . SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education, s. 437-445, 46th SEFI Annual Conference, København, Danmark, 17/09/2018.

Educating Engineers for Sustainability : understanding student differences. / Smink, Carla Kornelia; Holgaard, Jette Egelund; Clausen, Nicolaj Riise; Kolmos, Anette.

Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence . red. / Robin Clark; Peter Munkebo Hussmann; Hannu-Matti Järvinen ; Mike Murphy; Martin Etchells Vigild . SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education, 2018. s. 437-445.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Educating Engineers for Sustainability

T2 - understanding student differences

AU - Smink, Carla Kornelia

AU - Holgaard, Jette Egelund

AU - Clausen, Nicolaj Riise

AU - Kolmos, Anette

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Embedding sustainability in engineering education includes a potential to interrelate programmes with a specific focus on sustainability science, with other engineering programmes. In this paper, we explore how engineering students from sustainability science and other disciplines could benefit by working together already during their line of study. We will investigate the differences in the level of preparedness between engineering students in non-sustainability programmes and engineering students in sustainability programmes when they start their education and when they finish their studies.This article is based on a longitudinal empirical survey-study (2010-2016). 4.339 engineering students from 104 different study programs at eight Danish universities and Schools of Engineering have participated in this study. We use data from a Research Council Project called PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark), as well as the follow-up study PROCEED-2-work.The findings show that engineering students in sustainability programmes express significantly lower self-confidence and they are significantly more uncertain about their abilities to perform well with regard to math and science tasks than engineering students in non-sustainability programmes. However, students within sustainability science also rate themselves in the beginning of their study to be significantly more skilled in terms of solving problems that have multiple solutions, and they rate their ability to work across disciplines significantly higher than their fellow students at the end of their study. Thereby there are clear and mutual potentials for cross-fertilisation by making students from sustainability science work with students from other disciplines.

AB - Embedding sustainability in engineering education includes a potential to interrelate programmes with a specific focus on sustainability science, with other engineering programmes. In this paper, we explore how engineering students from sustainability science and other disciplines could benefit by working together already during their line of study. We will investigate the differences in the level of preparedness between engineering students in non-sustainability programmes and engineering students in sustainability programmes when they start their education and when they finish their studies.This article is based on a longitudinal empirical survey-study (2010-2016). 4.339 engineering students from 104 different study programs at eight Danish universities and Schools of Engineering have participated in this study. We use data from a Research Council Project called PROCEED (Program of Research on Opportunities and Challenges in Engineering Education in Denmark), as well as the follow-up study PROCEED-2-work.The findings show that engineering students in sustainability programmes express significantly lower self-confidence and they are significantly more uncertain about their abilities to perform well with regard to math and science tasks than engineering students in non-sustainability programmes. However, students within sustainability science also rate themselves in the beginning of their study to be significantly more skilled in terms of solving problems that have multiple solutions, and they rate their ability to work across disciplines significantly higher than their fellow students at the end of their study. Thereby there are clear and mutual potentials for cross-fertilisation by making students from sustainability science work with students from other disciplines.

UR - https://www.sefi.be/?post_type=proceedings

M3 - Article in proceeding

SP - 437

EP - 445

BT - Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018

A2 - Clark, Robin

A2 - Hussmann, Peter Munkebo

A2 - Järvinen , Hannu-Matti

A2 - Murphy, Mike

A2 - Vigild , Martin Etchells

PB - SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education

ER -

Smink CK, Holgaard JE, Clausen NR, Kolmos A. Educating Engineers for Sustainability: understanding student differences. I Clark R, Hussmann PM, Järvinen H-M, Murphy M, Vigild ME, red., Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018: Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Engineering Education Excellence . SEFI: European Association for Engineering Education. 2018. s. 437-445