TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of load mass and position on the dynamic loading of the knees, shoulders and lumbar spine during lifting
T2 - a musculoskeletal modelling approach
AU - Skals, Sebastian
AU - Bláfoss, Rúni
AU - de Zee, Mark
AU - Andersen, Lars Louis
AU - Andersen, Michael Skipper
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Musculoskeletal models may enhance our understanding of the dynamic loading of the joints during manual material handling. This study used state-of-the-art musculoskeletal models to determine the effects of load mass, asymmetry angle, horizontal location and deposit height on the dynamic loading of the knees, shoulders and lumbar spine during lifting. Recommended weight limits and lifting indices were also calculated using the NIOSH lifting equation. Based on 1832 lifts from 22 subjects, we found that load mass had the most substantial effect on L5-S1 compression. Increments in asymmetry led to large increases in mediolateral shear, while load mass and asymmetry had significant effects on anteroposterior shear. Increased deposit height led to higher shoulder forces, while the horizontal location mostly affected the forces in the knees and shoulders. These results generally support the findings of previous research, but notable differences in the trends and magnitudes of the estimated forces were observed.
AB - Musculoskeletal models may enhance our understanding of the dynamic loading of the joints during manual material handling. This study used state-of-the-art musculoskeletal models to determine the effects of load mass, asymmetry angle, horizontal location and deposit height on the dynamic loading of the knees, shoulders and lumbar spine during lifting. Recommended weight limits and lifting indices were also calculated using the NIOSH lifting equation. Based on 1832 lifts from 22 subjects, we found that load mass had the most substantial effect on L5-S1 compression. Increments in asymmetry led to large increases in mediolateral shear, while load mass and asymmetry had significant effects on anteroposterior shear. Increased deposit height led to higher shoulder forces, while the horizontal location mostly affected the forces in the knees and shoulders. These results generally support the findings of previous research, but notable differences in the trends and magnitudes of the estimated forces were observed.
KW - Computer simulation
KW - Musculoskeletal system
KW - Occupational Injuries
U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103491
DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103491
M3 - Journal article
VL - 96
JO - Applied Ergonomics
JF - Applied Ergonomics
SN - 0003-6870
M1 - 103491
ER -