Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN"

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

81 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries.
At the European level this issue gained a greater prominence with the publication of the Guide MEANS “Means for Evaluating Actions of a Structural Nature”, that in 1999 presented the main guidelines, standards and recommendations of the European Commission for the assessment of socio-economic development programs involving Community funding. Several were the changes proposed by this guide, among others, a greater focus on a more open and democratic process of evaluation.
This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Titel2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance
ForlagInstitute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
Publikationsdato2013
Sider323-340
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Fingerprint

evaluation
community
European Commission
learning
learning process
funding
decision making
responsibility
economics
Values

Citer dette

Alves, S. (2013). Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN". I 2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance (s. 323-340). Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia.
Alves, Sonia. / Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN". 2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 2013. s. 323-340
@inproceedings{dd9e2f6e0e8c474fab88e1a1d88b0919,
title = "Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative {"}URBAN{"}",
abstract = "The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries.At the European level this issue gained a greater prominence with the publication of the Guide MEANS “Means for Evaluating Actions of a Structural Nature”, that in 1999 presented the main guidelines, standards and recommendations of the European Commission for the assessment of socio-economic development programs involving Community funding. Several were the changes proposed by this guide, among others, a greater focus on a more open and democratic process of evaluation. This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives.",
author = "Sonia Alves",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
pages = "323--340",
booktitle = "2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance",
publisher = "Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",

}

Alves, S 2013, Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN". i 2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, s. 323-340.

Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN". / Alves, Sonia.

2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 2013. s. 323-340.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN"

AU - Alves, Sonia

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries.At the European level this issue gained a greater prominence with the publication of the Guide MEANS “Means for Evaluating Actions of a Structural Nature”, that in 1999 presented the main guidelines, standards and recommendations of the European Commission for the assessment of socio-economic development programs involving Community funding. Several were the changes proposed by this guide, among others, a greater focus on a more open and democratic process of evaluation. This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives.

AB - The relevance of the relationship between evaluation and learning is widely acknowledged; as well as the importance of this learning process to support policy decision making and to judge the value of “what was done”, “how” and “with what results”. Although the activity of evaluation is not something new, but a field of knowledge with its own theories and practices, it is important to notice that there is great variability in the tradition and cultures of evaluation between countries.At the European level this issue gained a greater prominence with the publication of the Guide MEANS “Means for Evaluating Actions of a Structural Nature”, that in 1999 presented the main guidelines, standards and recommendations of the European Commission for the assessment of socio-economic development programs involving Community funding. Several were the changes proposed by this guide, among others, a greater focus on a more open and democratic process of evaluation. This paper presents and compares different conceptual and methodological frameworks created for the assessment of the European initiative Urban II, including the one that was used by the author in the context of an academic evaluation in the city of Porto. The comparative analysis of the results leads us to the recommendation for more democratic processes of evaluation and intervention, in order to improve their quality and accountability and promote the important goal of learning with this type of experimental initiatives.

M3 - Article in proceeding

SP - 323

EP - 340

BT - 2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance

PB - Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia

ER -

Alves S. Evaluation and Evaluating the Community Initiative "URBAN". I 2nd International Scientific Conference: Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia. 2013. s. 323-340