TY - JOUR
T1 - Facilitating Reflection and Progression in PBL
T2 - A Content Analysis of Generic Competences in Formal PBL Curricula
AU - Boelt, Anders Melbye
AU - Kolmos, Anette
AU - Bertel, Lykke Brogaard
PY - 2021/12/20
Y1 - 2021/12/20
N2 - This paper proposes a systematic approach to the analysis of the prevalence of generic competences in formal problem-based learning (PBL) curricula at higher education institutions and universities in which generic competences are an integral and integrated part of the curriculum, with a particular focus on how the generic competences are specified explicitly in the curriculum. A case study on the implementation of PBL competences at Aalborg University (AAU) shows, that the dialectic relationship between knowledge and practice is limited after the first semester, with the risk that both knowledge, skills, and competences related to PBL become tacit and thus might be less easily expressed and related to the development of a professional identity. Based on this we argue that revision of the formal curricula must support students with theoretical knowledge on PBL, project management, and group collaboration throughout the study to accommodate a greater variety in types of problems, projects, and complexity. This calls for further elaboration of ‘generic’ competence frameworks and points to challenges and potentials for near-future and next practice curriculum development particularly with attention to the concept of progression, thus providing a benchmark for future research assessing the integration of PBL competences in formal curricula.
AB - This paper proposes a systematic approach to the analysis of the prevalence of generic competences in formal problem-based learning (PBL) curricula at higher education institutions and universities in which generic competences are an integral and integrated part of the curriculum, with a particular focus on how the generic competences are specified explicitly in the curriculum. A case study on the implementation of PBL competences at Aalborg University (AAU) shows, that the dialectic relationship between knowledge and practice is limited after the first semester, with the risk that both knowledge, skills, and competences related to PBL become tacit and thus might be less easily expressed and related to the development of a professional identity. Based on this we argue that revision of the formal curricula must support students with theoretical knowledge on PBL, project management, and group collaboration throughout the study to accommodate a greater variety in types of problems, projects, and complexity. This calls for further elaboration of ‘generic’ competence frameworks and points to challenges and potentials for near-future and next practice curriculum development particularly with attention to the concept of progression, thus providing a benchmark for future research assessing the integration of PBL competences in formal curricula.
KW - Generic competences
KW - PBL (Problem Based Learning)
KW - Curriculum Development
U2 - 10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6354
DO - 10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6354
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2246-0918
VL - 9
SP - 131
EP - 149
JO - Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education
JF - Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education
IS - 1
ER -