Four Normative Languages of Welfare

A pragmatic sociological investigation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This article explores the normative languages used by ordinary citizens to measure ongoing welfare state transformations in Denmark. Empirically, the article turns to qualitative data from a deliberative democratic forum where 35 citizens gathered to reflect upon and discuss the future of the welfare state. Conceptually, it relies upon the order of worth-framework derived from the French pragmatic sociology of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot. The analysis shows how citizens use a number of orders of worth when discussing the future of the welfare state. Four standards of worth seem to be of particular importance: (1) A civic order of worth, defining individualism and welfare consumerism as the big problems while emphasizing the need for every citizen to mentally step out of their selfish state of mind and care more for others and society as such. (2) A domestic order of worth stating that the problems of the current welfare state are particularly located within groups of ill-mannered and anti-social people that must be educated and disciplined. (3) An industrial order of worth, leading participants to problematize bureaucratic inefficiency and waste of resources. (4) And finally, a market order of worth stating welfare dependency to be one of the big problems and stressing the need for individual responsibility and for giving structural incentives for such behaviour.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDistinktion : Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)47-67
Antal sider21
ISSN1600-910X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2 jan. 2018

Fingerprint

welfare state
pragmatics
welfare
citizen
language
individualism
Denmark
sociology
incentive
responsibility
market
resources
Group

Citer dette

@article{39bce8d046b741e7a1a25f9d85fd4700,
title = "Four Normative Languages of Welfare: A pragmatic sociological investigation",
abstract = "This article explores the normative languages used by ordinary citizens to measure ongoing welfare state transformations in Denmark. Empirically, the article turns to qualitative data from a deliberative democratic forum where 35 citizens gathered to reflect upon and discuss the future of the welfare state. Conceptually, it relies upon the order of worth-framework derived from the French pragmatic sociology of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Th{\'e}venot. The analysis shows how citizens use a number of orders of worth when discussing the future of the welfare state. Four standards of worth seem to be of particular importance: (1) A civic order of worth, defining individualism and welfare consumerism as the big problems while emphasizing the need for every citizen to mentally step out of their selfish state of mind and care more for others and society as such. (2) A domestic order of worth stating that the problems of the current welfare state are particularly located within groups of ill-mannered and anti-social people that must be educated and disciplined. (3) An industrial order of worth, leading participants to problematize bureaucratic inefficiency and waste of resources. (4) And finally, a market order of worth stating welfare dependency to be one of the big problems and stressing the need for individual responsibility and for giving structural incentives for such behaviour.",
keywords = "Deliberative forum, Laurent Th{\'e}venot, Luc Boltanski, orders of worth, pragmatic sociology, qualitative research, social policy, the welfare state",
author = "Nielsen, {Mathias Herup}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/1600910X.2017.1412336",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "47--67",
journal = "Distinktion",
issn = "1600-910X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Four Normative Languages of Welfare : A pragmatic sociological investigation. / Nielsen, Mathias Herup.

I: Distinktion : Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, Bind 19, Nr. 1, 02.01.2018, s. 47-67.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Four Normative Languages of Welfare

T2 - A pragmatic sociological investigation

AU - Nielsen, Mathias Herup

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - This article explores the normative languages used by ordinary citizens to measure ongoing welfare state transformations in Denmark. Empirically, the article turns to qualitative data from a deliberative democratic forum where 35 citizens gathered to reflect upon and discuss the future of the welfare state. Conceptually, it relies upon the order of worth-framework derived from the French pragmatic sociology of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot. The analysis shows how citizens use a number of orders of worth when discussing the future of the welfare state. Four standards of worth seem to be of particular importance: (1) A civic order of worth, defining individualism and welfare consumerism as the big problems while emphasizing the need for every citizen to mentally step out of their selfish state of mind and care more for others and society as such. (2) A domestic order of worth stating that the problems of the current welfare state are particularly located within groups of ill-mannered and anti-social people that must be educated and disciplined. (3) An industrial order of worth, leading participants to problematize bureaucratic inefficiency and waste of resources. (4) And finally, a market order of worth stating welfare dependency to be one of the big problems and stressing the need for individual responsibility and for giving structural incentives for such behaviour.

AB - This article explores the normative languages used by ordinary citizens to measure ongoing welfare state transformations in Denmark. Empirically, the article turns to qualitative data from a deliberative democratic forum where 35 citizens gathered to reflect upon and discuss the future of the welfare state. Conceptually, it relies upon the order of worth-framework derived from the French pragmatic sociology of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot. The analysis shows how citizens use a number of orders of worth when discussing the future of the welfare state. Four standards of worth seem to be of particular importance: (1) A civic order of worth, defining individualism and welfare consumerism as the big problems while emphasizing the need for every citizen to mentally step out of their selfish state of mind and care more for others and society as such. (2) A domestic order of worth stating that the problems of the current welfare state are particularly located within groups of ill-mannered and anti-social people that must be educated and disciplined. (3) An industrial order of worth, leading participants to problematize bureaucratic inefficiency and waste of resources. (4) And finally, a market order of worth stating welfare dependency to be one of the big problems and stressing the need for individual responsibility and for giving structural incentives for such behaviour.

KW - Deliberative forum

KW - Laurent Thévenot

KW - Luc Boltanski

KW - orders of worth

KW - pragmatic sociology

KW - qualitative research

KW - social policy

KW - the welfare state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038399433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1600910X.2017.1412336

DO - 10.1080/1600910X.2017.1412336

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 47

EP - 67

JO - Distinktion

JF - Distinktion

SN - 1600-910X

IS - 1

ER -