From the Library to the Field

Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012

Lasse Gøhler Johansson, Jutta Maria Vikman, Andreas Jan Liljenstrøm, Simo Køppe

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingForskningpeer review

Resumé

What is humanities research? What characterizes the methodological preferences of humanities researchers: their choices of theory, empirical sources and analytical methods/techniques? And how have these preferences changed in recent years? This paper discusses the methods and results of a study of the methodological preferences of humanities researchers in Denmark. The study is based on a systematic reading of all humanities PhD dissertations defended at Danish universities between 1992 and 2012 (N=1,958). It uses simple descriptive statistics to analyze changes in the methodological preferences of humanities researchers during that period. One could say that the study combines a more humanistic approach (the reading of texts) with a more social scientific approach (statistical analysis). The main finding of the study is that ethnography is slowly replacing the interpretation of texts as the preferred methodology of humanities researchers, as the field moves into the 21st century. We discuss the historical conditions of these changes, including the influence from the intellectual current known as post-modernism and from research policy increasingly pressing for application-oriented research (as opposed to fundamental research). Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using PhD dissertations as a source for studying research practices in the humanities. We compare to other approaches, including bibliometric, ethnographic and survey-based.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelMapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro
Publikationsdato21 sep. 2017
StatusUdgivet - 21 sep. 2017
BegivenhedSeminário Internacional Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil -
Varighed: 19 sep. 201721 sep. 2017

Konference

KonferenceSeminário Internacional Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil
Periode19/09/201721/09/2017

Citer dette

Johansson, L. G., Vikman, J. M., Liljenstrøm, A. J., & Køppe, S. (2017). From the Library to the Field: Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012. I Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro
Johansson, Lasse Gøhler ; Vikman, Jutta Maria ; Liljenstrøm, Andreas Jan ; Køppe, Simo. / From the Library to the Field : Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012. Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro. 2017.
@inbook{541e827ce444486ba4a0fccdad4c9a1c,
title = "From the Library to the Field: Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012",
abstract = "What is humanities research? What characterizes the methodological preferences of humanities researchers: their choices of theory, empirical sources and analytical methods/techniques? And how have these preferences changed in recent years? This paper discusses the methods and results of a study of the methodological preferences of humanities researchers in Denmark. The study is based on a systematic reading of all humanities PhD dissertations defended at Danish universities between 1992 and 2012 (N=1,958). It uses simple descriptive statistics to analyze changes in the methodological preferences of humanities researchers during that period. One could say that the study combines a more humanistic approach (the reading of texts) with a more social scientific approach (statistical analysis). The main finding of the study is that ethnography is slowly replacing the interpretation of texts as the preferred methodology of humanities researchers, as the field moves into the 21st century. We discuss the historical conditions of these changes, including the influence from the intellectual current known as post-modernism and from research policy increasingly pressing for application-oriented research (as opposed to fundamental research). Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using PhD dissertations as a source for studying research practices in the humanities. We compare to other approaches, including bibliometric, ethnographic and survey-based.",
author = "Johansson, {Lasse G{\o}hler} and Vikman, {Jutta Maria} and Liljenstr{\o}m, {Andreas Jan} and Simo K{\o}ppe",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "21",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Mapeando as Din{\^a}micas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro",

}

Johansson, LG, Vikman, JM, Liljenstrøm, AJ & Køppe, S 2017, From the Library to the Field: Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012. i Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro., 19/09/2017.

From the Library to the Field : Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012. / Johansson, Lasse Gøhler; Vikman, Jutta Maria; Liljenstrøm, Andreas Jan; Køppe, Simo.

Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro. 2017.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingForskningpeer review

TY - ABST

T1 - From the Library to the Field

T2 - Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012

AU - Johansson, Lasse Gøhler

AU - Vikman, Jutta Maria

AU - Liljenstrøm, Andreas Jan

AU - Køppe, Simo

PY - 2017/9/21

Y1 - 2017/9/21

N2 - What is humanities research? What characterizes the methodological preferences of humanities researchers: their choices of theory, empirical sources and analytical methods/techniques? And how have these preferences changed in recent years? This paper discusses the methods and results of a study of the methodological preferences of humanities researchers in Denmark. The study is based on a systematic reading of all humanities PhD dissertations defended at Danish universities between 1992 and 2012 (N=1,958). It uses simple descriptive statistics to analyze changes in the methodological preferences of humanities researchers during that period. One could say that the study combines a more humanistic approach (the reading of texts) with a more social scientific approach (statistical analysis). The main finding of the study is that ethnography is slowly replacing the interpretation of texts as the preferred methodology of humanities researchers, as the field moves into the 21st century. We discuss the historical conditions of these changes, including the influence from the intellectual current known as post-modernism and from research policy increasingly pressing for application-oriented research (as opposed to fundamental research). Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using PhD dissertations as a source for studying research practices in the humanities. We compare to other approaches, including bibliometric, ethnographic and survey-based.

AB - What is humanities research? What characterizes the methodological preferences of humanities researchers: their choices of theory, empirical sources and analytical methods/techniques? And how have these preferences changed in recent years? This paper discusses the methods and results of a study of the methodological preferences of humanities researchers in Denmark. The study is based on a systematic reading of all humanities PhD dissertations defended at Danish universities between 1992 and 2012 (N=1,958). It uses simple descriptive statistics to analyze changes in the methodological preferences of humanities researchers during that period. One could say that the study combines a more humanistic approach (the reading of texts) with a more social scientific approach (statistical analysis). The main finding of the study is that ethnography is slowly replacing the interpretation of texts as the preferred methodology of humanities researchers, as the field moves into the 21st century. We discuss the historical conditions of these changes, including the influence from the intellectual current known as post-modernism and from research policy increasingly pressing for application-oriented research (as opposed to fundamental research). Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using PhD dissertations as a source for studying research practices in the humanities. We compare to other approaches, including bibliometric, ethnographic and survey-based.

UR - http://www.anped.org.br/content/seminario-internacional-mapeando-dinamicas-das-humanidades-no-brasil

M3 - Conference abstract in proceeding

BT - Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro

ER -

Johansson LG, Vikman JM, Liljenstrøm AJ, Køppe S. From the Library to the Field: Changing Methodological Preferences of Humanities Researchers, 1992-2012. I Mapeando as Dinâmicas das Humanidades no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro. 2017