How Should We Define eHealth, and Does the Definition Matter?

Chris Showell; Christian Nøhr

doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-101-4-881

How Should We Define eHealth, and Does the Definition Matter?

Chris Showell
, Christian Nøhr

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceeding › Konferenceartikel i proceeding › Forskning › peer review

31 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

There is no useful definition for eHealth; we would like to find one. This study will provide a contribution to clarify the discussion on eHealth as a concept to enhance the understanding of the range of meanings which have been ascribed to the term ehealth.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	Quality of Life Through Quality of Information : Proceedings of MIE2012 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics)
Redaktører	John Mantas, Stig Kjaer Andersen, Maria Cristina Mazzoleni, Bernd Blobel, Silvana Quaglini
Forlag	IOS Press
Publikationsdato	2012
Sider	881 - 884
ISBN (Trykt)	978-1614991007, 1614991006
DOI	https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-101-4-881
Status	Udgivet - 2012
Begivenhed	Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE - Pisa, Italien Varighed: 26 aug. 2012 → 29 aug. 2012 Konferencens nummer: 24

Konference

Konference	Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE
Nummer	24
Land/Område	Italien
By	Pisa
Periode	26/08/2012 → 29/08/2012

Navn	Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Vol/bind	180
ISSN	0926-9630

Adgang til dokumentet

10.3233/978-1-61499-101-4-881

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

Showell, Chris ; Nøhr, Christian. / How Should We Define eHealth, and Does the Definition Matter?. Quality of Life Through Quality of Information: Proceedings of MIE2012 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics). red. / John Mantas ; Stig Kjaer Andersen ; Maria Cristina Mazzoleni ; Bernd Blobel ; Silvana Quaglini. IOS Press, 2012. s. 881 - 884 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Bind 180).

@inproceedings{92b1f177fa3545df81bd5f5a4631688d,

title = "How Should We Define eHealth, and Does the Definition Matter?",

abstract = "There is no useful definition for eHealth; we would like to find one. This study will provide a contribution to clarify the discussion on eHealth as a concept to enhance the understanding of the range of meanings which have been ascribed to the term ehealth.",

author = "Chris Showell and Christian N{\o}hr",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-101-4-881",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1614991007",

series = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",

publisher = "IOS Press",

pages = "881 -- 884",

editor = "Mantas, \{John \} and Andersen, \{Stig Kjaer \} and Mazzoleni, \{Maria Cristina \} and Blobel, \{Bernd \} and Quaglini, \{Silvana \}",

booktitle = "Quality of Life Through Quality of Information",

address = "Netherlands",

note = "Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE ; Conference date: 26-08-2012 Through 29-08-2012",

}

Showell, C & Nøhr, C 2012, How Should We Define eHealth, and Does the Definition Matter? i J Mantas, SK Andersen, MC Mazzoleni, B Blobel & S Quaglini (red), Quality of Life Through Quality of Information: Proceedings of MIE2012 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics). IOS Press, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, bind 180, s. 881 - 884, Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE, Pisa, Italien, 26/08/2012. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-101-4-881

How Should We Define eHealth, and Does the Definition Matter? / Showell, Chris; Nøhr, Christian.
Quality of Life Through Quality of Information: Proceedings of MIE2012 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics). red. / John Mantas; Stig Kjaer Andersen; Maria Cristina Mazzoleni; Bernd Blobel; Silvana Quaglini. IOS Press, 2012. s. 881 - 884 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Bind 180).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceeding › Konferenceartikel i proceeding › Forskning › peer review