Resumé

Within the smart energy and smart grid field, Demand Response (DR) is expected to play an important role in balancing energy consumption with intermittent energy production from renewable sources in the future. This DR vision, in many cases, relies on active involvement of households in actions aimed at time shifting their energy demand. However, DR solutions targeted households have had a rather limited diffusion and impact so far, and it has proven difficult to ensure sustained user engagement.

Based on practice-theoretical approaches to residential energy demand, this paper takes as its starting point that new methods to involve households are required if we are going to design DR solutions that will be successful in engaging households in DR actions. As a contribution to this, the paper explores what role learning might play in realizing DR solutions based on active involvement of households. Here, learning is understood as both the self-reflection about own habits and the appropriation of new practices. The role of learning is explored by, first, identifying and discussing the types of situations and dynamics in everyday life that can initiate processes of learning. Such situations or dynamics are termed “initiators of cultivation”, and examples include social feedback, encountering others’ ways of doing, embodied sensory feedback, etc. Secondly, we discuss to what extent existing DR approaches are employing these situations or dynamics in order to foster instances of learning in relation to moving everyday practices in time. The conclusion is that the scope of present DR approaches is quite narrow and only addresses a limited number of possible initiators of cultivation. Therefore, the paper provides some first ideas on how to make DR designs better at initiating processes of learning, which could lead to more engaging and successful DR solutions. This part informs policy-makers as well as DR solution designers.

The paper is based on a literature review. We are not necessarily implying that new learning approaches “by default” result in efficient DR solutions that are successful in changing the energy consumption profiles of households. This is an open question, which needs further theoretical and empirical exploration to be answered, but we hope that our paper contributes to the foundation of such further investigation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Titeleceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings : Is efficient sufficient?
ForlagEuropean Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE
Publikationsdatojun. 2019
ISBN (Trykt)978-91-983878-0-3
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-91-983878-1-0
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2019

Citer dette

Christensen, T. H., Larsen, S. P. A. K., & Knudsen, H. N. (2019). How to engage households in energy demand response solutions? I eceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings: Is efficient sufficient? European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE.
Christensen, Toke Haunstrup ; Larsen, Simon Peter Aslak Kondrup ; Knudsen, Henrik N. / How to engage households in energy demand response solutions?. eceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings: Is efficient sufficient?. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE, 2019.
@inproceedings{40263df329974124af7aca15a0da57a1,
title = "How to engage households in energy demand response solutions?",
abstract = "Within the smart energy and smart grid field, Demand Response (DR) is expected to play an important role in balancing energy consumption with intermittent energy production from renewable sources in the future. This DR vision, in many cases, relies on active involvement of households in actions aimed at time shifting their energy demand. However, DR solutions targeted households have had a rather limited diffusion and impact so far, and it has proven difficult to ensure sustained user engagement.Based on practice-theoretical approaches to residential energy demand, this paper takes as its starting point that new methods to involve households are required if we are going to design DR solutions that will be successful in engaging households in DR actions. As a contribution to this, the paper explores what role learning might play in realizing DR solutions based on active involvement of households. Here, learning is understood as both the self-reflection about own habits and the appropriation of new practices. The role of learning is explored by, first, identifying and discussing the types of situations and dynamics in everyday life that can initiate processes of learning. Such situations or dynamics are termed “initiators of cultivation”, and examples include social feedback, encountering others’ ways of doing, embodied sensory feedback, etc. Secondly, we discuss to what extent existing DR approaches are employing these situations or dynamics in order to foster instances of learning in relation to moving everyday practices in time. The conclusion is that the scope of present DR approaches is quite narrow and only addresses a limited number of possible initiators of cultivation. Therefore, the paper provides some first ideas on how to make DR designs better at initiating processes of learning, which could lead to more engaging and successful DR solutions. This part informs policy-makers as well as DR solution designers.The paper is based on a literature review. We are not necessarily implying that new learning approaches “by default” result in efficient DR solutions that are successful in changing the energy consumption profiles of households. This is an open question, which needs further theoretical and empirical exploration to be answered, but we hope that our paper contributes to the foundation of such further investigation.",
author = "Christensen, {Toke Haunstrup} and Larsen, {Simon Peter Aslak Kondrup} and Knudsen, {Henrik N.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-91-983878-0-3",
booktitle = "eceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings",
publisher = "European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE",

}

Christensen, TH, Larsen, SPAK & Knudsen, HN 2019, How to engage households in energy demand response solutions? i eceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings: Is efficient sufficient?. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE.

How to engage households in energy demand response solutions? / Christensen, Toke Haunstrup; Larsen, Simon Peter Aslak Kondrup; Knudsen, Henrik N.

eceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings: Is efficient sufficient?. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE, 2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

TY - GEN

T1 - How to engage households in energy demand response solutions?

AU - Christensen, Toke Haunstrup

AU - Larsen, Simon Peter Aslak Kondrup

AU - Knudsen, Henrik N.

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Within the smart energy and smart grid field, Demand Response (DR) is expected to play an important role in balancing energy consumption with intermittent energy production from renewable sources in the future. This DR vision, in many cases, relies on active involvement of households in actions aimed at time shifting their energy demand. However, DR solutions targeted households have had a rather limited diffusion and impact so far, and it has proven difficult to ensure sustained user engagement.Based on practice-theoretical approaches to residential energy demand, this paper takes as its starting point that new methods to involve households are required if we are going to design DR solutions that will be successful in engaging households in DR actions. As a contribution to this, the paper explores what role learning might play in realizing DR solutions based on active involvement of households. Here, learning is understood as both the self-reflection about own habits and the appropriation of new practices. The role of learning is explored by, first, identifying and discussing the types of situations and dynamics in everyday life that can initiate processes of learning. Such situations or dynamics are termed “initiators of cultivation”, and examples include social feedback, encountering others’ ways of doing, embodied sensory feedback, etc. Secondly, we discuss to what extent existing DR approaches are employing these situations or dynamics in order to foster instances of learning in relation to moving everyday practices in time. The conclusion is that the scope of present DR approaches is quite narrow and only addresses a limited number of possible initiators of cultivation. Therefore, the paper provides some first ideas on how to make DR designs better at initiating processes of learning, which could lead to more engaging and successful DR solutions. This part informs policy-makers as well as DR solution designers.The paper is based on a literature review. We are not necessarily implying that new learning approaches “by default” result in efficient DR solutions that are successful in changing the energy consumption profiles of households. This is an open question, which needs further theoretical and empirical exploration to be answered, but we hope that our paper contributes to the foundation of such further investigation.

AB - Within the smart energy and smart grid field, Demand Response (DR) is expected to play an important role in balancing energy consumption with intermittent energy production from renewable sources in the future. This DR vision, in many cases, relies on active involvement of households in actions aimed at time shifting their energy demand. However, DR solutions targeted households have had a rather limited diffusion and impact so far, and it has proven difficult to ensure sustained user engagement.Based on practice-theoretical approaches to residential energy demand, this paper takes as its starting point that new methods to involve households are required if we are going to design DR solutions that will be successful in engaging households in DR actions. As a contribution to this, the paper explores what role learning might play in realizing DR solutions based on active involvement of households. Here, learning is understood as both the self-reflection about own habits and the appropriation of new practices. The role of learning is explored by, first, identifying and discussing the types of situations and dynamics in everyday life that can initiate processes of learning. Such situations or dynamics are termed “initiators of cultivation”, and examples include social feedback, encountering others’ ways of doing, embodied sensory feedback, etc. Secondly, we discuss to what extent existing DR approaches are employing these situations or dynamics in order to foster instances of learning in relation to moving everyday practices in time. The conclusion is that the scope of present DR approaches is quite narrow and only addresses a limited number of possible initiators of cultivation. Therefore, the paper provides some first ideas on how to make DR designs better at initiating processes of learning, which could lead to more engaging and successful DR solutions. This part informs policy-makers as well as DR solution designers.The paper is based on a literature review. We are not necessarily implying that new learning approaches “by default” result in efficient DR solutions that are successful in changing the energy consumption profiles of households. This is an open question, which needs further theoretical and empirical exploration to be answered, but we hope that our paper contributes to the foundation of such further investigation.

UR - https://www.eceee.org/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Summer_Studies/

M3 - Article in proceeding

SN - 978-91-983878-0-3

BT - eceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings

PB - European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE

ER -

Christensen TH, Larsen SPAK, Knudsen HN. How to engage households in energy demand response solutions? I eceee 2019 Summer Study proceedings: Is efficient sufficient?. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, ECEEE. 2019