‘I don’t know why I’m here’

From knot-working to not-knowing

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose – This paper examines the idea of getting lost during field studies as a point of departure for reframing research questions.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents fieldnotes and reflections to illustrate the process of tracing innovation in the field by means of a theoretical concept – ‘knot-working’ as proposed by Engeström (2008). By paying attention to seemingly irrelevant empirical data and experiences of being lost, the author infused another theoretical concept – ‘not-knowing’ as proposed by Lather (2007).
Findings – By questioning research questions, it becomes possible to challenge conventional assumptions in the field under study as well as assumptions underlying existing theory. It is argued that good research questions evolve iteratively throughout a study and might be even more valuable than answers (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). The paper illustrates how not-knowing can serve as a methodological perspective from where ordinary held assumptions can be reconsidered, thus paving the way for novel research questions that can enhance established theory.
Originality/value – The paper reframes the research question: ‘How is the elder care sector affected by innovation imperatives’, and poses the reverse question: How are innovation imperatives affected -- or how could they be affected -- by the notion of care.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelAnnual of Organizational Ethnography
Publikationsdato2013
StatusUdgivet - 2013
BegivenhedAnnual University of Liverpool 8th Ethnography Symposium - Amsterdam, Holland
Varighed: 28 aug. 201330 aug. 2013

Konference

KonferenceAnnual University of Liverpool 8th Ethnography Symposium
LandHolland
ByAmsterdam
Periode28/08/201330/08/2013

Emneord

  • innovation
  • VET education
  • elder care
  • care
  • not-knowing
  • knot-working
  • bisociation

Citer dette

@inbook{593959d663f248fdb8367579803c27a2,
title = "‘I don’t know why I’m here’: From knot-working to not-knowing",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper examines the idea of getting lost during field studies as a point of departure for reframing research questions. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents fieldnotes and reflections to illustrate the process of tracing innovation in the field by means of a theoretical concept – ‘knot-working’ as proposed by Engestr{\"o}m (2008). By paying attention to seemingly irrelevant empirical data and experiences of being lost, the author infused another theoretical concept – ‘not-knowing’ as proposed by Lather (2007). Findings – By questioning research questions, it becomes possible to challenge conventional assumptions in the field under study as well as assumptions underlying existing theory. It is argued that good research questions evolve iteratively throughout a study and might be even more valuable than answers (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). The paper illustrates how not-knowing can serve as a methodological perspective from where ordinary held assumptions can be reconsidered, thus paving the way for novel research questions that can enhance established theory. Originality/value – The paper reframes the research question: ‘How is the elder care sector affected by innovation imperatives’, and poses the reverse question: How are innovation imperatives affected -- or how could they be affected -- by the notion of care.",
keywords = "innovation, VET education, elder care, care, not-knowing, knot-working, bisociation",
author = "Charlotte Wegener",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Annual of Organizational Ethnography",

}

Wegener, C 2013, ‘I don’t know why I’m here’: From knot-working to not-knowing. i Annual of Organizational Ethnography. Annual University of Liverpool 8th Ethnography Symposium, Amsterdam, Holland, 28/08/2013.

‘I don’t know why I’m here’ : From knot-working to not-knowing. / Wegener, Charlotte.

Annual of Organizational Ethnography. 2013.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingForskningpeer review

TY - ABST

T1 - ‘I don’t know why I’m here’

T2 - From knot-working to not-knowing

AU - Wegener, Charlotte

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose – This paper examines the idea of getting lost during field studies as a point of departure for reframing research questions. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents fieldnotes and reflections to illustrate the process of tracing innovation in the field by means of a theoretical concept – ‘knot-working’ as proposed by Engeström (2008). By paying attention to seemingly irrelevant empirical data and experiences of being lost, the author infused another theoretical concept – ‘not-knowing’ as proposed by Lather (2007). Findings – By questioning research questions, it becomes possible to challenge conventional assumptions in the field under study as well as assumptions underlying existing theory. It is argued that good research questions evolve iteratively throughout a study and might be even more valuable than answers (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). The paper illustrates how not-knowing can serve as a methodological perspective from where ordinary held assumptions can be reconsidered, thus paving the way for novel research questions that can enhance established theory. Originality/value – The paper reframes the research question: ‘How is the elder care sector affected by innovation imperatives’, and poses the reverse question: How are innovation imperatives affected -- or how could they be affected -- by the notion of care.

AB - Purpose – This paper examines the idea of getting lost during field studies as a point of departure for reframing research questions. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents fieldnotes and reflections to illustrate the process of tracing innovation in the field by means of a theoretical concept – ‘knot-working’ as proposed by Engeström (2008). By paying attention to seemingly irrelevant empirical data and experiences of being lost, the author infused another theoretical concept – ‘not-knowing’ as proposed by Lather (2007). Findings – By questioning research questions, it becomes possible to challenge conventional assumptions in the field under study as well as assumptions underlying existing theory. It is argued that good research questions evolve iteratively throughout a study and might be even more valuable than answers (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). The paper illustrates how not-knowing can serve as a methodological perspective from where ordinary held assumptions can be reconsidered, thus paving the way for novel research questions that can enhance established theory. Originality/value – The paper reframes the research question: ‘How is the elder care sector affected by innovation imperatives’, and poses the reverse question: How are innovation imperatives affected -- or how could they be affected -- by the notion of care.

KW - innovation

KW - VET education

KW - elder care

KW - care

KW - not-knowing

KW - knot-working

KW - bisociation

M3 - Conference abstract in proceeding

BT - Annual of Organizational Ethnography

ER -