Infrastructural politics on Facebook

The case of the Copenhagen ’payment ring’ controversy

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

Resumé

If Twitter started as a device for reporting one’s everyday comings and goings, it has in recent years come to be seen also as a resource for understanding and problematizing things like revolutions, disasters and politics (Rogers 2013). In this paper, I raise the question of whether a similar broadening of the avenues of possible inquiry could be timely in relation to Facebook. What can we learn from Facebook as a venue for organizing in emergencies or around public issues? In order start answering this question I examine a recent controversy over plans to build a new road-pricing infrastructure to curb congestion in Copenhagen. The so-called payment ring project has now been officially dropped, but only after becoming one of the most heated topics in Danish politics in recent years. Thousands of people mobilized on Facebook pages for and against the actualization of the payment ring. I suggest that such issue-oriented pages represent an interesting reappropriation of the Facebook platform, whose ’pages’ feature is mainly targeted at commercial brands and other institutions. The majority of the pages founded in reaction to the payment ring were marked by sharp protests, something that generates considerable friction against Facebook’s engagement economy where all participation is assumed ’like-able’. Moreover, this reappropriation is worth examining because Facebook comes with a blurring of the public/private divide that disturbs the top-down/bottom up dichotomy found in many discourses around public participation in city planning, e.g. about ’smart cities’. The use of Facebook pages in the payment ring controversy appears as an experimental form of infrastructural politics in which experts and lay people, politicians and grassroots, commercial interests and public issues are deployed in a device that does not discriminate in the way institutionalized politics does. The result is not’democratization’ in any straightforward way, but a recasting of the repertoires of action usually associated with these different roles.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2014
StatusUdgivet - 2014
BegivenhedJoint ESOCITE/4S conference - Intercontinental Hotel Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Varighed: 20 aug. 201423 aug. 2014

Konference

KonferenceJoint ESOCITE/4S conference
LokationIntercontinental Hotel Buenos Aires
LandArgentina
ByBuenos Aires
Periode20/08/201423/08/2014

Fingerprint

facebook
politics
participation
twitter
protest
politician
pricing
disaster
road
expert
infrastructure
planning
economy
discourse
resources

Citer dette

Birkbak, A. (2014). Infrastructural politics on Facebook: The case of the Copenhagen ’payment ring’ controversy. Abstract fra Joint ESOCITE/4S conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
@conference{fa234363b6e0424cb2919ed5c1bf301e,
title = "Infrastructural politics on Facebook: The case of the Copenhagen ’payment ring’ controversy",
abstract = "If Twitter started as a device for reporting one’s everyday comings and goings, it has in recent years come to be seen also as a resource for understanding and problematizing things like revolutions, disasters and politics (Rogers 2013). In this paper, I raise the question of whether a similar broadening of the avenues of possible inquiry could be timely in relation to Facebook. What can we learn from Facebook as a venue for organizing in emergencies or around public issues? In order start answering this question I examine a recent controversy over plans to build a new road-pricing infrastructure to curb congestion in Copenhagen. The so-called payment ring project has now been officially dropped, but only after becoming one of the most heated topics in Danish politics in recent years. Thousands of people mobilized on Facebook pages for and against the actualization of the payment ring. I suggest that such issue-oriented pages represent an interesting reappropriation of the Facebook platform, whose ’pages’ feature is mainly targeted at commercial brands and other institutions. The majority of the pages founded in reaction to the payment ring were marked by sharp protests, something that generates considerable friction against Facebook’s engagement economy where all participation is assumed ’like-able’. Moreover, this reappropriation is worth examining because Facebook comes with a blurring of the public/private divide that disturbs the top-down/bottom up dichotomy found in many discourses around public participation in city planning, e.g. about ’smart cities’. The use of Facebook pages in the payment ring controversy appears as an experimental form of infrastructural politics in which experts and lay people, politicians and grassroots, commercial interests and public issues are deployed in a device that does not discriminate in the way institutionalized politics does. The result is not’democratization’ in any straightforward way, but a recasting of the repertoires of action usually associated with these different roles.",
author = "Andreas Birkbak",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
note = "Joint ESOCITE/4S conference ; Conference date: 20-08-2014 Through 23-08-2014",

}

Infrastructural politics on Facebook : The case of the Copenhagen ’payment ring’ controversy. / Birkbak, Andreas.

2014. Abstract fra Joint ESOCITE/4S conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

TY - ABST

T1 - Infrastructural politics on Facebook

T2 - The case of the Copenhagen ’payment ring’ controversy

AU - Birkbak, Andreas

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - If Twitter started as a device for reporting one’s everyday comings and goings, it has in recent years come to be seen also as a resource for understanding and problematizing things like revolutions, disasters and politics (Rogers 2013). In this paper, I raise the question of whether a similar broadening of the avenues of possible inquiry could be timely in relation to Facebook. What can we learn from Facebook as a venue for organizing in emergencies or around public issues? In order start answering this question I examine a recent controversy over plans to build a new road-pricing infrastructure to curb congestion in Copenhagen. The so-called payment ring project has now been officially dropped, but only after becoming one of the most heated topics in Danish politics in recent years. Thousands of people mobilized on Facebook pages for and against the actualization of the payment ring. I suggest that such issue-oriented pages represent an interesting reappropriation of the Facebook platform, whose ’pages’ feature is mainly targeted at commercial brands and other institutions. The majority of the pages founded in reaction to the payment ring were marked by sharp protests, something that generates considerable friction against Facebook’s engagement economy where all participation is assumed ’like-able’. Moreover, this reappropriation is worth examining because Facebook comes with a blurring of the public/private divide that disturbs the top-down/bottom up dichotomy found in many discourses around public participation in city planning, e.g. about ’smart cities’. The use of Facebook pages in the payment ring controversy appears as an experimental form of infrastructural politics in which experts and lay people, politicians and grassroots, commercial interests and public issues are deployed in a device that does not discriminate in the way institutionalized politics does. The result is not’democratization’ in any straightforward way, but a recasting of the repertoires of action usually associated with these different roles.

AB - If Twitter started as a device for reporting one’s everyday comings and goings, it has in recent years come to be seen also as a resource for understanding and problematizing things like revolutions, disasters and politics (Rogers 2013). In this paper, I raise the question of whether a similar broadening of the avenues of possible inquiry could be timely in relation to Facebook. What can we learn from Facebook as a venue for organizing in emergencies or around public issues? In order start answering this question I examine a recent controversy over plans to build a new road-pricing infrastructure to curb congestion in Copenhagen. The so-called payment ring project has now been officially dropped, but only after becoming one of the most heated topics in Danish politics in recent years. Thousands of people mobilized on Facebook pages for and against the actualization of the payment ring. I suggest that such issue-oriented pages represent an interesting reappropriation of the Facebook platform, whose ’pages’ feature is mainly targeted at commercial brands and other institutions. The majority of the pages founded in reaction to the payment ring were marked by sharp protests, something that generates considerable friction against Facebook’s engagement economy where all participation is assumed ’like-able’. Moreover, this reappropriation is worth examining because Facebook comes with a blurring of the public/private divide that disturbs the top-down/bottom up dichotomy found in many discourses around public participation in city planning, e.g. about ’smart cities’. The use of Facebook pages in the payment ring controversy appears as an experimental form of infrastructural politics in which experts and lay people, politicians and grassroots, commercial interests and public issues are deployed in a device that does not discriminate in the way institutionalized politics does. The result is not’democratization’ in any straightforward way, but a recasting of the repertoires of action usually associated with these different roles.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

ER -

Birkbak A. Infrastructural politics on Facebook: The case of the Copenhagen ’payment ring’ controversy. 2014. Abstract fra Joint ESOCITE/4S conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina.