Is Regression Gain or Instantaneous Gain the most reliable and reproducible gain value when performing video Head Impulse Testing of the lateral semicircular canals?

Chris Ladefoged Jacobsen; Emil Riis Abrahamsen; Regitze Kuhr Skals; Dan Dupont Hougaard

Is Regression Gain or Instantaneous Gain the most reliable and reproducible gain value when performing video Head Impulse Testing of the lateral semicircular canals?

Chris Ladefoged Jacobsen, Emil Riis Abrahamsen, Regitze Kuhr Skals, Dan Dupont Hougaard

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskrift › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › peer review

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Publikationsdato	2018
Antal sider	1
Status	Udgivet - 2018
Begivenhed	IV årsmøde Dansk Selskab for Vestibulogi 2018 - Hotel Nyborg Strand, Nyborg, Danmark Varighed: 30 nov. 2018 → 30 nov. 2018

Konference

Konference	IV årsmøde Dansk Selskab for Vestibulogi 2018
Lokation	Hotel Nyborg Strand
Land/Område	Danmark
By	Nyborg
Periode	30/11/2018 → 30/11/2018

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Citationsformater

@conference{cb3f450ff0ec4860bcfc48a2136e7755,

title = "Is Regression Gain or Instantaneous Gain the most reliable and reproducible gain value when performing video Head Impulse Testing of the lateral semicircular canals?",

author = "Jacobsen, {Chris Ladefoged} and Abrahamsen, {Emil Riis} and Skals, {Regitze Kuhr} and Hougaard, {Dan Dupont}",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

pages = "4",

note = "IV {\aa}rsm{\o}de Dansk Selskab for Vestibulogi 2018 ; Conference date: 30-11-2018 Through 30-11-2018",

}

Is Regression Gain or Instantaneous Gain the most reliable and reproducible gain value when performing video Head Impulse Testing of the lateral semicircular canals? / Jacobsen, Chris Ladefoged ; Abrahamsen, Emil Riis ; Skals, Regitze Kuhr et al.
2018. 4 Abstract fra IV årsmøde Dansk Selskab for Vestibulogi 2018, Nyborg, Danmark.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskrift › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › peer review