Long-term outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors with reversible vs. non-reversible causes

Carlo Alberto Barcella, Brian E. Grunau, Meijiao Guan, Nathaniel M. Hawkins, Marc W. Deyell, Jason G. Andrade, Jennie S. Helmer, Graham C. Wong, Kristian H. Kragholm, Karin H. Humphries, Jim Christenson, Christopher B. Fordyce*

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

2 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS: A reversible cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is vaguely defined in international guidelines as an identifiable transient or potentially correctable condition. However, studies evaluating long-term outcomes of patients experiencing OHCA due to reversible and non-reversible causes are lacking. We aimed to determine differences in long-term outcomes in OHCA survivors according to different aetiology.

METHODS AND RESULTS: From the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest registry, adults with non-traumatic OHCA (2009-2016) surviving to hospital discharge were identified. Patients were categorized by OHCA aetiology combining reversibility and underlying ischaemic aetiology. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent OHCA, or re-hospitalization for sudden cardiac arrest or ventricular arrhythmias. Using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models, we compared the risk of the composite outcome according to different OHCA aetiology. Of 1325 OHCA hospital-discharge survivors (median age 62.8 years, 77.9% male), 431 (32.5%) had reversible ischaemic, 415 (31.3%), non-reversible ischaemic, 99 (7.5%), reversible non-ischaemic, and 380 (28.7%), non-reversible non-ischaemic aetiologies. At 3 years post discharge, the Kaplan-Meier event-free rate was highest in patients with a reversible ischaemic aetiology [91%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 87-94%], and lowest in those with a reversible non-ischaemic aetiology (62%, 95% CI 51-72%). In multivariate analyses, compared with non-reversible non-ischaemic cause, reversible ischaemic cause was associated with a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR; 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.81), reversible non-ischaemic cause with a significantly higher HR (1.53, 95% CI 1.03-2.32), and non-reversible ischaemic cause with a non-significant HR (0.92, 95% CI 0.64-1.33) for the composite outcome.

CONCLUSION: Compared to other aetiologies, the presence of a reversible ischaemic cause is associated with improved long-term OHCA outcomes.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummerzuae097
TidsskriftEuropean Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
Vol/bind13
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)715-725
Antal sider11
ISSN2048-8726
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 okt. 2024

Bibliografisk note

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Long-term outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors with reversible vs. non-reversible causes'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater