TY - JOUR
T1 - Making Appearances
T2 - How Robots Should Approach People
AU - Joosse, Michiel
AU - Lohse, Manja
AU - van Berkel, Niels
AU - Sardar, Aziez
AU - Evers, Vanessa
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - To prepare for a future in which robots are more commonplace, it is important to know what robot behaviors people find socially normative. Previous work suggests that for robots to be accepted by people, the robot should adhere to the prevalent social norms, such as those related to approaching people. However, we do not expect that socially normative approach behaviors for robots can be translated on a one-on-one basis from people to robots, because currently robots have unique and different features to humans, including (but not limited to) wheels, sounds, and shapes. The two studies presented in this article go beyond the state-of-the-art and focus on socially normative approach behaviors for robots. In the first study, we compared people's responses to violations of personal space done by robots compared to people. In the second study, we explored what features (sound, size, speed) of a robot approaching people have an effect on acceptance. Findings indicate that people are more lenient toward violations of a social norm by a robot as compared to a person. Also, we found that robots can use their unique features to mitigate the negative effects of norm violations by communicating intent.
AB - To prepare for a future in which robots are more commonplace, it is important to know what robot behaviors people find socially normative. Previous work suggests that for robots to be accepted by people, the robot should adhere to the prevalent social norms, such as those related to approaching people. However, we do not expect that socially normative approach behaviors for robots can be translated on a one-on-one basis from people to robots, because currently robots have unique and different features to humans, including (but not limited to) wheels, sounds, and shapes. The two studies presented in this article go beyond the state-of-the-art and focus on socially normative approach behaviors for robots. In the first study, we compared people's responses to violations of personal space done by robots compared to people. In the second study, we explored what features (sound, size, speed) of a robot approaching people have an effect on acceptance. Findings indicate that people are more lenient toward violations of a social norm by a robot as compared to a person. Also, we found that robots can use their unique features to mitigate the negative effects of norm violations by communicating intent.
KW - Social robots
KW - functional noise
KW - height
KW - human-robot collaboration
KW - human-robot interaction
KW - interpersonal distance
KW - personal space invasion
KW - proxemics
KW - robot approach
KW - robot navigation
KW - social norms
KW - velocity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100940303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3385121
DO - 10.1145/3385121
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2163-0364
VL - 10
JO - ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
JF - ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
IS - 1
M1 - 3385121
ER -