Spring til hovednavigatio Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

Minimally invasive surgical treatments versus non-surgical treatments or placebo for plantar fasciopathy: A systematic review

  • Stefan Møller*
  • , Jonas Ammundsen Ipsen
  • , Henriette Jahn Aunass
  • , Per Aagaard
  • , Bjarke Viberg
  • , Ane Simony
  • , Henrik Riel
  • *Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review (oversigtsartikel) › peer review

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Due to advances in minimally invasive surgical treatments (MIST), this systematic review with a narrative synthesis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of MIST in improving pain compared with non-surgical treatment or placebo in patients with plantar fasciopathy (PF). Methods We systematically searched relevant databases for peer-reviewed studies comparing MIST to non-surgical treatments or placebo. Results Eight studies were included. The results demonstrated statistically significant superiority in pain reduction for percutaneous needle treatments compared to non-surgical treatments or placebo in five studies. One study compared endoscopic plantar fascia release to exercise and corticosteroid injections and found a statistically significant superiority of endoscopic plantar fascia release. Conclusions This systematic review found promising effects of needle treatments to reduce pain among patients with PF. Endoscopic plantar fascia release was superior to the comparator in one of three studies. High risks of bias and methodological heterogeneity limit the strength of the available evidence. Level of clinical evidence II.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFoot and Ankle Surgery
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)672-683
Antal sider12
ISSN1268-7731
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2025

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Minimally invasive surgical treatments versus non-surgical treatments or placebo for plantar fasciopathy: A systematic review'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater