Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is superior to mouth-to-pocket mask and bag-valve-mask ventilation during lifeguard CPR: A randomized study

Kasper Adelborg, Christian Dalgas, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Carsten Jørgensen, Rozh Husain Al-Mashhadi, Bo Løfgren*

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

42 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a crucial determinant of outcome following cardiac arrest. Interruptions in chest compressions are detrimental. We aimed to compare the effect of mouth-to-mouth ventilation (MMV), mouth-to-pocket mask ventilation (MPV) and bag-valve-mask ventilation (BMV) on the quality of CPR. Materials and methods: Surf lifeguards in active service were included in the study. Each surf lifeguard was randomized to perform three sessions of single-rescuer CPR using each of the three ventilation techniques (MMV, MPV and BMV) separated by 5. min of rest. Data were obtained from a resuscitation manikin and video recordings. Results: A total of 60 surf lifeguards were included (67% male, 33% female, mean age 25 years). Interruptions in chest compressions were significantly reduced by MMV (8.9 ± 1.6. s) when compared to MPV (10.7 ± 3.0. s, P

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftResuscitation
Vol/bind82
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)618-622
Antal sider5
ISSN0300-9572
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2011

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is superior to mouth-to-pocket mask and bag-valve-mask ventilation during lifeguard CPR: A randomized study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater