Negative laparoscopy unveiled

John Jarrell*, Lars Arendt-Nielsen

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

2 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Studies indicate a variable proportion of laparoscopies done for the management of non-acute pelvic pain that do not identify visible pathology and are called negative laparoscopies. Possible explanations have included undetected endometriosis, observer error, and/or neural tissues in the endometrium acting as nociceptive input. The goal was to compare demographic and pain testing measures between women with negative laparoscopies and confirmed endometriosis in a cohort of women presenting with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: Women with chronic pelvic pain (n = 255) provided written consent for the study prior to entry. Data were collected at the time of clinic visit and entered contemporaneously into SPSS. Pain sensitization was identified as the presence of cutaneous allodynia. Clinical, pain, and pain sensitization variables were compared using Student’s t-test. Results: The frequency of negative laparoscopy was 13.7% (35 cases) and that of confirmed endometriosis was 27.1% (69 cases). There were no differences between women with a negative laparoscopy and women with confirmed endometriosis in clinical, dysmenorrhea, or pain testing measurements. Conclusion: The data suggest in the absence of endometriotic tissue in the pelvis, chronic visceral pain may result from a uterine origin and result in a generalized pattern of pain and pain sensitization.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)18-21
Antal sider4
ISSN2284-0265
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 mar. 2018

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Negative laparoscopy unveiled'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater