NOMA or Puncturing for Uplink eMBB-URLLC Coexistence from an AoI Perspective?

Through the lens of the age-of-information (AoI) metric, this paper takes a fresh look into the performance of coexisting enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) and ultra-reliable low-latency (URLLC) services in the uplink scenario. To reduce AoI, a URLLC user with stochastic packet arrivals has two options: orthogonal multiple access (OMA) with the preemption of the eMBB user (labeled as puncturing) or non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) with the ongoing eMBB transmission. Puncturing leads to lower average AoI at the expense of the decrease in the eMBB user's rate, as well as in signaling complexity. On the other hand, NOMA can provide a higher eMBB rate at the expense of URLLC packet loss due to interference and, thus, the degradation in AoI performance. We study under which conditions NOMA could provide an average AoI performance that is close to the one of the puncturing, while maintaining the gain in the data rate. To this end, we derive a closed-form expression for the average AoI and investigate conditions on the eMBB and URLLC distances from the base station at which the difference between the average AoI in NOMA and in puncturing is within some small gap β. Our results show that with β as small as 0.1 minislot, the eMBB rate in NOMA can be roughly 5 times higher than that of puncturing. Thus, by choosing an appropriate access scheme, both the favorable average AoI for URLLC users and the high data rate for eMBB users can be achieved.