Omar is Dead

Aphasia and the Escalating Radicalization Business

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

On February 15, 2015, Omar El Hussein was shot dead by the Danish police. Earlier that day, Omar had killed two people: a Jewish guard in front of a Copenhagen synagogue and a participant in a cultural event on freedom of speech. A few days later, the Danish government adopted a (counter-) terror-package for the extraordinary sum of US$150 million. Although the package was presented as a firm response to the Copenhagen shootings, the legislation primarily targeted so-called Danish “Islamic foreign fighters”. Among relatives and acquaintances of Omar, the slippage was clearly noticed. Omar had never fought in the Middle East, nor was he known to be religious in any way. Omar was known, first and foremost, as a brother and a petty criminal who had recently been released from a Danish prison. Based on long-term fieldwork among Danish Muslims and two years of fieldwork among returned Danish jihadists, this paper discusses the ripple effects of the terrorist attack in Copenhagen. I argue that a central condition for the change of scale from “criminal Danish citizen” to “Islamic foreign fighter” is aphasia (cf. Stoler 2016) – the occlusion of knowledge surrounding Omar that was consolidated with his death (cf. Stoler 2016). The empty space of Omar enabled a new political logic that produced new scales of measurement, which, in turn, led to an accelerating radicalisation industry that occluded the killing of other Danish Muslim citizens – namely, the victims of a gang war in Danish housing projects.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHistory and Anthropology
ISSN0275-7206
StatusAfsendt - 2018

Citer dette

@article{903ae3acc65146cebe0830c25d2108b2,
title = "Omar is Dead: Aphasia and the Escalating Radicalization Business",
abstract = "On February 15, 2015, Omar El Hussein was shot dead by the Danish police. Earlier that day, Omar had killed two people: a Jewish guard in front of a Copenhagen synagogue and a participant in a cultural event on freedom of speech. A few days later, the Danish government adopted a (counter-) terror-package for the extraordinary sum of US$150 million. Although the package was presented as a firm response to the Copenhagen shootings, the legislation primarily targeted so-called Danish “Islamic foreign fighters”. Among relatives and acquaintances of Omar, the slippage was clearly noticed. Omar had never fought in the Middle East, nor was he known to be religious in any way. Omar was known, first and foremost, as a brother and a petty criminal who had recently been released from a Danish prison. Based on long-term fieldwork among Danish Muslims and two years of fieldwork among returned Danish jihadists, this paper discusses the ripple effects of the terrorist attack in Copenhagen. I argue that a central condition for the change of scale from “criminal Danish citizen” to “Islamic foreign fighter” is aphasia (cf. Stoler 2016) – the occlusion of knowledge surrounding Omar that was consolidated with his death (cf. Stoler 2016). The empty space of Omar enabled a new political logic that produced new scales of measurement, which, in turn, led to an accelerating radicalisation industry that occluded the killing of other Danish Muslim citizens – namely, the victims of a gang war in Danish housing projects.",
author = "Anja Kublitz",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
journal = "History and Anthropology",
issn = "0275-7206",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Omar is Dead : Aphasia and the Escalating Radicalization Business. / Kublitz, Anja.

I: History and Anthropology, 2018.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Omar is Dead

T2 - Aphasia and the Escalating Radicalization Business

AU - Kublitz, Anja

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - On February 15, 2015, Omar El Hussein was shot dead by the Danish police. Earlier that day, Omar had killed two people: a Jewish guard in front of a Copenhagen synagogue and a participant in a cultural event on freedom of speech. A few days later, the Danish government adopted a (counter-) terror-package for the extraordinary sum of US$150 million. Although the package was presented as a firm response to the Copenhagen shootings, the legislation primarily targeted so-called Danish “Islamic foreign fighters”. Among relatives and acquaintances of Omar, the slippage was clearly noticed. Omar had never fought in the Middle East, nor was he known to be religious in any way. Omar was known, first and foremost, as a brother and a petty criminal who had recently been released from a Danish prison. Based on long-term fieldwork among Danish Muslims and two years of fieldwork among returned Danish jihadists, this paper discusses the ripple effects of the terrorist attack in Copenhagen. I argue that a central condition for the change of scale from “criminal Danish citizen” to “Islamic foreign fighter” is aphasia (cf. Stoler 2016) – the occlusion of knowledge surrounding Omar that was consolidated with his death (cf. Stoler 2016). The empty space of Omar enabled a new political logic that produced new scales of measurement, which, in turn, led to an accelerating radicalisation industry that occluded the killing of other Danish Muslim citizens – namely, the victims of a gang war in Danish housing projects.

AB - On February 15, 2015, Omar El Hussein was shot dead by the Danish police. Earlier that day, Omar had killed two people: a Jewish guard in front of a Copenhagen synagogue and a participant in a cultural event on freedom of speech. A few days later, the Danish government adopted a (counter-) terror-package for the extraordinary sum of US$150 million. Although the package was presented as a firm response to the Copenhagen shootings, the legislation primarily targeted so-called Danish “Islamic foreign fighters”. Among relatives and acquaintances of Omar, the slippage was clearly noticed. Omar had never fought in the Middle East, nor was he known to be religious in any way. Omar was known, first and foremost, as a brother and a petty criminal who had recently been released from a Danish prison. Based on long-term fieldwork among Danish Muslims and two years of fieldwork among returned Danish jihadists, this paper discusses the ripple effects of the terrorist attack in Copenhagen. I argue that a central condition for the change of scale from “criminal Danish citizen” to “Islamic foreign fighter” is aphasia (cf. Stoler 2016) – the occlusion of knowledge surrounding Omar that was consolidated with his death (cf. Stoler 2016). The empty space of Omar enabled a new political logic that produced new scales of measurement, which, in turn, led to an accelerating radicalisation industry that occluded the killing of other Danish Muslim citizens – namely, the victims of a gang war in Danish housing projects.

M3 - Journal article

JO - History and Anthropology

JF - History and Anthropology

SN - 0275-7206

ER -