On the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT methods for PV systems

Dezso Sera; Laszlo Mathe; Tamas Kerekes; Sergiu Spataru; Remus Teodorescu

doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2261118

On the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT methods for PV systems

Dezso Sera, Laszlo Mathe, Tamas Kerekes, Sergiu Spataru, Remus Teodorescu

AAU Energi

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

672 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed analysis of the two most well-known hill-climbing MPPT algorithms, the Perturb-and-Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC). The purpose of the analysis is to clarify some common misconceptions in the literature regarding these two trackers, therefore helping the selection process for a suitable MPPT for both researchers and industry. The two methods are thoroughly analyzed both from mathematical and practical implementation point of view. Their mathematical analysis reveals that there is no difference between the two. This has been confirmed by experimental tests according to the EN 50530 standard, resulting in a deviation between their efficiencies of 0.13% in dynamic, and as low as 0.02% in static conditions.
The results show that despite the common opinion in the literature, the P&O and INC are equivalent.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	I E E E Journal of Photovoltaics
Vol/bind	3
Udgave nummer	3
Sider (fra-til)	1070-1078
Antal sider	8
ISSN	2156-3381
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2261118
Status	Udgivet - 2013

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2261118

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Citationsformater

@article{85876d1c38ae419ebea4f421966168a2,

title = "On the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT methods for PV systems",

abstract = "This paper presents a detailed analysis of the two most well-known hill-climbing MPPT algorithms, the Perturb-and-Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC). The purpose of the analysis is to clarify some common misconceptions in the literature regarding these two trackers, therefore helping the selection process for a suitable MPPT for both researchers and industry. The two methods are thoroughly analyzed both from mathematical and practical implementation point of view. Their mathematical analysis reveals that there is no difference between the two. This has been confirmed by experimental tests according to the EN 50530 standard, resulting in a deviation between their efficiencies of 0.13% in dynamic, and as low as 0.02% in static conditions.The results show that despite the common opinion in the literature, the P&O and INC are equivalent.",

keywords = "MPPT, Perturb and Observe, Incremental Conductance, Discrete implementation, Photovoltaic systems",

author = "Dezso Sera and Laszlo Mathe and Tamas Kerekes and Sergiu Spataru and Remus Teodorescu",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2261118",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "1070--1078",

journal = "I E E E Journal of Photovoltaics",

issn = "2156-3381",

publisher = "IEEE",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT methods for PV systems

AU - Sera, Dezso

AU - Mathe, Laszlo

AU - Kerekes, Tamas

AU - Spataru, Sergiu

AU - Teodorescu, Remus

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper presents a detailed analysis of the two most well-known hill-climbing MPPT algorithms, the Perturb-and-Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC). The purpose of the analysis is to clarify some common misconceptions in the literature regarding these two trackers, therefore helping the selection process for a suitable MPPT for both researchers and industry. The two methods are thoroughly analyzed both from mathematical and practical implementation point of view. Their mathematical analysis reveals that there is no difference between the two. This has been confirmed by experimental tests according to the EN 50530 standard, resulting in a deviation between their efficiencies of 0.13% in dynamic, and as low as 0.02% in static conditions.The results show that despite the common opinion in the literature, the P&O and INC are equivalent.

AB - This paper presents a detailed analysis of the two most well-known hill-climbing MPPT algorithms, the Perturb-and-Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC). The purpose of the analysis is to clarify some common misconceptions in the literature regarding these two trackers, therefore helping the selection process for a suitable MPPT for both researchers and industry. The two methods are thoroughly analyzed both from mathematical and practical implementation point of view. Their mathematical analysis reveals that there is no difference between the two. This has been confirmed by experimental tests according to the EN 50530 standard, resulting in a deviation between their efficiencies of 0.13% in dynamic, and as low as 0.02% in static conditions.The results show that despite the common opinion in the literature, the P&O and INC are equivalent.

KW - MPPT

KW - Perturb and Observe

KW - Incremental Conductance

KW - Discrete implementation

KW - Photovoltaic systems

U2 - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2261118

DO - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2261118

M3 - Journal article

SN - 2156-3381

VL - 3

SP - 1070

EP - 1078

JO - I E E E Journal of Photovoltaics

JF - I E E E Journal of Photovoltaics

IS - 3

ER -

On the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT methods for PV systems

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

AUB Link

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater