Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance: blurring ecology and physiology

Fredrik Jutfelt; Tommy Norin; Rasmus Em Andersen; Johannes Overgaard; Tobias Wang; David J. McKenzie; Sjannie Lefevre; Göran E. Nilsson; Neil B. Metcalfe; Anthony J. R. Hickey; Jeroen Brijs; Ben Speers-Roesch; Dominique G. Roche; A. Kurt Gamperl; Graham D. Raby; Rachael Morgan; Andrew J. Esbaugh; Albin Gräns; Michael Axelsson; Andreas Ekström; Erik Sandblom; Sandra A. Binning; James W. Hicks; Frank Seebacher; Christian Jørgensen; Shaun S. Killen; Patricia M. Schulte; Timothy D. Clark

doi:10.1242/jeb.169615

Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance: blurring ecology and physiology

Fredrik Jutfelt, Tommy Norin, Rasmus Em Andersen, Johannes Overgaard, Tobias Wang, David J. McKenzie, Sjannie Lefevre, Göran E. Nilsson, Neil B. Metcalfe, Anthony J. R. Hickey, Jeroen Brijs, Ben Speers-Roesch, Dominique G. Roche, A. Kurt Gamperl, Graham D. Raby, Rachael Morgan, Andrew J. Esbaugh, Albin Gräns, Michael Axelsson, Andreas EkströmErik Sandblom, Sandra A. Binning, James W. Hicks, Frank Seebacher, Christian Jørgensen, Shaun S. Killen, Patricia M. Schulte, Timothy D. Clark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › peer review

199 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The Commentary by Pörtner, Bock and Mark (Pörtner et al., 2017)
elaborates on the oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance
(OCLTT) hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Biology
Commentaries allow for personal and controversial views, yet
the journal also mandates that ‘opinion and fact must be
clearly distinguishable’ (http://jeb.biologists.org/content/articletypes#
comms). We contend that Pörtner et al. (2017) do not meet
this requirement, and that they present a biased account of the
OCLTT hypothesis. We raise two main points: (1) Pörtner et al.
(2017) do not do justice to the growing number of empirical studies
that failed to support the OCLTT hypothesis when specifically
testing its predictions, and (2) in response to these studies, and
without new empirical evidence to support OCLTT, Pörtner and
colleagues have gradually redefined the core assumptions of the
hypothesis so that it is increasingly difficult to test and has lost
predictive power.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	jeb169615
Tidsskrift	Journal of Experimental Biology
Vol/bind	221
Udgave nummer	1
Antal sider	4
ISSN	0022-0949
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.169615
Status	Udgivet - 10 jan. 2018

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1242/jeb.169615

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Andre filer og links

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040507514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

Citationsformater

Jutfelt, F., Norin, T., Andersen, R. E., Overgaard, J., Wang, T., McKenzie, D. J., Lefevre, S., Nilsson, G. E., Metcalfe, N. B., Hickey, A. J. R., Brijs, J., Speers-Roesch, B., Roche, D. G., Gamperl, A. K., Raby, G. D., Morgan, R., Esbaugh, A. J., Gräns, A., Axelsson, M., ... Clark, T. D. (2018). Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance: blurring ecology and physiology. Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(1), Artikel jeb169615. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.169615

@article{9e22ffaaf5214470830396326fea90e7,

title = "Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance: blurring ecology and physiology",

abstract = "The Commentary by P{\"o}rtner, Bock and Mark (P{\"o}rtner et al., 2017)elaborates on the oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance(OCLTT) hypothesis. Journal of Experimental BiologyCommentaries allow for personal and controversial views, yetthe journal also mandates that {\textquoteleft}opinion and fact must beclearly distinguishable{\textquoteright} (http://jeb.biologists.org/content/articletypes#comms). We contend that P{\"o}rtner et al. (2017) do not meetthis requirement, and that they present a biased account of theOCLTT hypothesis. We raise two main points: (1) P{\"o}rtner et al.(2017) do not do justice to the growing number of empirical studiesthat failed to support the OCLTT hypothesis when specificallytesting its predictions, and (2) in response to these studies, andwithout new empirical evidence to support OCLTT, P{\"o}rtner andcolleagues have gradually redefined the core assumptions of thehypothesis so that it is increasingly difficult to test and has lostpredictive power.",

author = "Fredrik Jutfelt and Tommy Norin and Andersen, {Rasmus Em} and Johannes Overgaard and Tobias Wang and McKenzie, {David J.} and Sjannie Lefevre and Nilsson, {G{\"o}ran E.} and Metcalfe, {Neil B.} and Hickey, {Anthony J. R.} and Jeroen Brijs and Ben Speers-Roesch and Roche, {Dominique G.} and Gamperl, {A. Kurt} and Raby, {Graham D.} and Rachael Morgan and Esbaugh, {Andrew J.} and Albin Gr{\"a}ns and Michael Axelsson and Andreas Ekstr{\"o}m and Erik Sandblom and Binning, {Sandra A.} and Hicks, {James W.} and Frank Seebacher and Christian J{\o}rgensen and Killen, {Shaun S.} and Schulte, {Patricia M.} and Clark, {Timothy D.}",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1242/jeb.169615",

language = "English",

volume = "221",

journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",

issn = "0022-0949",

publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",

number = "1",

}

Jutfelt, F, Norin, T, Andersen, RE, Overgaard, J, Wang, T, McKenzie, DJ, Lefevre, S, Nilsson, GE, Metcalfe, NB, Hickey, AJR, Brijs, J, Speers-Roesch, B, Roche, DG, Gamperl, AK, Raby, GD, Morgan, R, Esbaugh, AJ, Gräns, A, Axelsson, M, Ekström, A, Sandblom, E, Binning, SA, Hicks, JW, Seebacher, F, Jørgensen, C, Killen, SS, Schulte, PM & Clark, TD 2018, 'Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance: blurring ecology and physiology', Journal of Experimental Biology, bind 221, nr. 1, jeb169615. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.169615

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance

T2 - blurring ecology and physiology

AU - Jutfelt, Fredrik

AU - Norin, Tommy

AU - Andersen, Rasmus Em

AU - Overgaard, Johannes

AU - Wang, Tobias

AU - McKenzie, David J.

AU - Lefevre, Sjannie

AU - Nilsson, Göran E.

AU - Metcalfe, Neil B.

AU - Hickey, Anthony J. R.

AU - Brijs, Jeroen

AU - Speers-Roesch, Ben

AU - Roche, Dominique G.

AU - Gamperl, A. Kurt

AU - Raby, Graham D.

AU - Morgan, Rachael

AU - Esbaugh, Andrew J.

AU - Gräns, Albin

AU - Axelsson, Michael

AU - Ekström, Andreas

AU - Sandblom, Erik

AU - Binning, Sandra A.

AU - Hicks, James W.

AU - Seebacher, Frank

AU - Jørgensen, Christian

AU - Killen, Shaun S.

AU - Schulte, Patricia M.

AU - Clark, Timothy D.

PY - 2018/1/10

Y1 - 2018/1/10

N2 - The Commentary by Pörtner, Bock and Mark (Pörtner et al., 2017)elaborates on the oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance(OCLTT) hypothesis. Journal of Experimental BiologyCommentaries allow for personal and controversial views, yetthe journal also mandates that ‘opinion and fact must beclearly distinguishable’ (http://jeb.biologists.org/content/articletypes#comms). We contend that Pörtner et al. (2017) do not meetthis requirement, and that they present a biased account of theOCLTT hypothesis. We raise two main points: (1) Pörtner et al.(2017) do not do justice to the growing number of empirical studiesthat failed to support the OCLTT hypothesis when specificallytesting its predictions, and (2) in response to these studies, andwithout new empirical evidence to support OCLTT, Pörtner andcolleagues have gradually redefined the core assumptions of thehypothesis so that it is increasingly difficult to test and has lostpredictive power.

AB - The Commentary by Pörtner, Bock and Mark (Pörtner et al., 2017)elaborates on the oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance(OCLTT) hypothesis. Journal of Experimental BiologyCommentaries allow for personal and controversial views, yetthe journal also mandates that ‘opinion and fact must beclearly distinguishable’ (http://jeb.biologists.org/content/articletypes#comms). We contend that Pörtner et al. (2017) do not meetthis requirement, and that they present a biased account of theOCLTT hypothesis. We raise two main points: (1) Pörtner et al.(2017) do not do justice to the growing number of empirical studiesthat failed to support the OCLTT hypothesis when specificallytesting its predictions, and (2) in response to these studies, andwithout new empirical evidence to support OCLTT, Pörtner andcolleagues have gradually redefined the core assumptions of thehypothesis so that it is increasingly difficult to test and has lostpredictive power.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040507514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.169615

DO - 10.1242/jeb.169615

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0022-0949

VL - 221

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

IS - 1

M1 - jeb169615

ER -

Oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance: blurring ecology and physiology

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

AUB Link

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater