Pearl and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability—part II

Marina de Tommaso, Viviana Betti, Tommaso Bocci, Nadia Bolognini, Francesco Di Russo, Francesco Fattapposta, Raffaele Ferri, Sara Invitto, Giacomo Koch, Carlo Miniussi, Francesco Piccione, Aldo Ragazzoni, Ferdinando Sartucci, Simone Rossi, Massimiliano Valeriani*

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReview (oversigtsartikel)peer review

3 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This review focuses on new and/or less standardized event-related potentials methods, in order to improve their knowledge for future clinical applications. The olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) assess the olfactory functions in time domain, with potential utility in anosmia and degenerative diseases. The transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) could support the investigation of the intracerebral connections with very high temporal discrimination. Its application in the diagnosis of disorders of consciousness has achieved recent confirmation. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and event-related fields (ERF) could improve spatial accuracy of scalp signals, with potential large application in pre-surgical study of epileptic patients. Although these techniques have methodological limits, such as high inter- and intraindividual variability and high costs, their diffusion among researchers and clinicians is hopeful, pending their standardization.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNeurological Sciences
Vol/bind41
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)3503-3515
Antal sider13
ISSN1590-1874
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Pearl and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability—part II'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater