Quality of Behavior Change Action Plans Created in Primary Care Settings as a Tool for Patient Involvement in Type 2 Diabetes Care

Pernille H. Kjaer, Mansi Dedhia, José Parra, Lawrence Fisher, Michael B. Potter, Niels Ejskjaer, Søren E. Skovlund, Danielle M. Hessler

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

Objectives: Action plans based on patient reported outcomes (PROs) made in consultation by adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their health care team have been proposed as a tool to improve clinical outcomes. The aim is to evaluate the quality of action plans.Methods: A two-arm cluster-randomized trial comparing Connection to Health (CTH) and Enhanced Engagement CTH (EE-CTH) in 12 primary care sites in the San Francisco Bay Area. Adults with T2D filled out a health survey prior to consultation to collect PROs. Action plans made in consultation focused on unhealthy behavior detected by the survey. Providers in EE-CTH were additionally trained in motivational interviewing and relationship building skills. Action plan quality was rated using an adapted version of the GET-D coding system (dual coding of 20 IRR gt;80, and examined for associations with intervention, patient demographics and PROs.Results: Overall quality of action plans was moderate-high with a mean score of 14.22 (SD=4.07) on a 0-20 quality scale (n=700). Significantly higher quality plans were created in CTH (M=14.87, SD=3.92) compared to EE-CTH (M=13.50, SD=4.12) (t(698)=4.50, plt;.001). Correlations with PROs and patient demographics were calculated with Pearson’s (r) or Spearman’s (rs) correlation. Higher patient health literacy and confidence in carrying out the plan were positively related to quality of action plans (rs =.089, p=.018) (rs =.138, plt;.001), whereas gender, age, language, race, level of education, depression, and social determinants of health (SDH) were unrelated to action plan quality (p=n.s.).Discussion: Both CTH and EE-CTH resulted in moderate-high quality action plans, but considerable quality variability was seen across patients. Action plan quality was significantly higher in CTH compared to EE-CTH. Results suggest no link to most patient demographics and PROs. However, health literacy and confidence level are positively related to action plan quality.Disclosure P.H. Kjaer: None. M. Dedhia: None. J. Parra: Employee; Self; Behavioral Diabetes Institute. L. Fisher: None. M.B. Potter: None. N. Ejskjaer: None. S.E. Skovlund: None. D.M. Hessler: Consultant; Self; Eli Lilly and Company.Funding National Institutes of Health (DK108039)
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer824-P
TidsskriftDiabetes
Vol/bind69
Udgave nummerSuppl. 1
ISSN0012-1797
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2020
BegivenhedAmerican Diabetes Association (ADA) 80th Scientific Sessions - Virtuel conference
Varighed: 12 jun. 202016 jun. 2020
Konferencens nummer: 80
https://ada.ondemand.org/2020virtualmeeting/

Konference

KonferenceAmerican Diabetes Association (ADA) 80th Scientific Sessions
Nummer80
LokationVirtuel conference
Periode12/06/202016/06/2020
Internetadresse

Citationsformater