Redefining territorial scales and the strategic role of spatial planning

Evidence from Denmark and Catalonia

Daniel Galland, Pablo Elinbaum

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

8 Citationer (Scopus)

Resumé

This paper argues that spatial planning systems tend to redefine and reinterpret conventional territorial scales through the dual adoption and articulation of legal instruments and spatial strategies at different levels of planning administration. In depicting such redefinition, this paper delves into the cases of Denmark and Catalonia through an analysis concerned with: i) the strategic spatial role attributed to each level of planning; and ii) the redefinition of territorial scales as a result of changing political objectives and spatial relationships occurring between planning levels. The assessment pertaining to the strategic roles of spatial planning instruments as well as the evolving redefinition of territorial scales in both Denmark and Catalonia suggests that the conventional, hierarchical ‘cascade-shaped’ ideal of policy implementation is superseded. While both cases tend to converge in their alignment with strategic spatial planning, the implications stemming from rescaling processes radically diverge as illustrated by the opposing fates of the regional scale and the distinctive means to reassure a ‘vertical spatial anchor’ for the stability and permanence of power structures.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftdisP - The Planning Review
Vol/bind51
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)66-85
ISSN0251-3625
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Fingerprint

spatial planning
Denmark
planning of administration
planning instrument
evidence
policy implementation
political goal
planning
distribution of power
planning system
strategic planning
anchor
Catalonia

Citer dette

@article{e80d453cf43540aa96e83a4aa4a42cfe,
title = "Redefining territorial scales and the strategic role of spatial planning: Evidence from Denmark and Catalonia",
abstract = "This paper argues that spatial planning systems tend to redefine and reinterpret conventional territorial scales through the dual adoption and articulation of legal instruments and spatial strategies at different levels of planning administration. In depicting such redefinition, this paper delves into the cases of Denmark and Catalonia through an analysis concerned with: i) the strategic spatial role attributed to each level of planning; and ii) the redefinition of territorial scales as a result of changing political objectives and spatial relationships occurring between planning levels. The assessment pertaining to the strategic roles of spatial planning instruments as well as the evolving redefinition of territorial scales in both Denmark and Catalonia suggests that the conventional, hierarchical ‘cascade-shaped’ ideal of policy implementation is superseded. While both cases tend to converge in their alignment with strategic spatial planning, the implications stemming from rescaling processes radically diverge as illustrated by the opposing fates of the regional scale and the distinctive means to reassure a ‘vertical spatial anchor’ for the stability and permanence of power structures.",
keywords = "spatial planning systems, rescaling, territorial scales, strategic spatial planning",
author = "Daniel Galland and Pablo Elinbaum",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/02513625.2015.1134963",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "66--85",
journal = "D I S P",
issn = "0251-3625",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Redefining territorial scales and the strategic role of spatial planning : Evidence from Denmark and Catalonia. / Galland, Daniel; Elinbaum, Pablo.

I: disP - The Planning Review, Bind 51, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 66-85.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Redefining territorial scales and the strategic role of spatial planning

T2 - Evidence from Denmark and Catalonia

AU - Galland, Daniel

AU - Elinbaum, Pablo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper argues that spatial planning systems tend to redefine and reinterpret conventional territorial scales through the dual adoption and articulation of legal instruments and spatial strategies at different levels of planning administration. In depicting such redefinition, this paper delves into the cases of Denmark and Catalonia through an analysis concerned with: i) the strategic spatial role attributed to each level of planning; and ii) the redefinition of territorial scales as a result of changing political objectives and spatial relationships occurring between planning levels. The assessment pertaining to the strategic roles of spatial planning instruments as well as the evolving redefinition of territorial scales in both Denmark and Catalonia suggests that the conventional, hierarchical ‘cascade-shaped’ ideal of policy implementation is superseded. While both cases tend to converge in their alignment with strategic spatial planning, the implications stemming from rescaling processes radically diverge as illustrated by the opposing fates of the regional scale and the distinctive means to reassure a ‘vertical spatial anchor’ for the stability and permanence of power structures.

AB - This paper argues that spatial planning systems tend to redefine and reinterpret conventional territorial scales through the dual adoption and articulation of legal instruments and spatial strategies at different levels of planning administration. In depicting such redefinition, this paper delves into the cases of Denmark and Catalonia through an analysis concerned with: i) the strategic spatial role attributed to each level of planning; and ii) the redefinition of territorial scales as a result of changing political objectives and spatial relationships occurring between planning levels. The assessment pertaining to the strategic roles of spatial planning instruments as well as the evolving redefinition of territorial scales in both Denmark and Catalonia suggests that the conventional, hierarchical ‘cascade-shaped’ ideal of policy implementation is superseded. While both cases tend to converge in their alignment with strategic spatial planning, the implications stemming from rescaling processes radically diverge as illustrated by the opposing fates of the regional scale and the distinctive means to reassure a ‘vertical spatial anchor’ for the stability and permanence of power structures.

KW - spatial planning systems

KW - rescaling

KW - territorial scales

KW - strategic spatial planning

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02513625.2015.1134963

U2 - 10.1080/02513625.2015.1134963

DO - 10.1080/02513625.2015.1134963

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 66

EP - 85

JO - D I S P

JF - D I S P

SN - 0251-3625

IS - 4

ER -