Reinventing planning and planners: Ideological decontestations and rhetorical appeals

Simin Davoudi, Daniel Galland, Dominic Stead

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

11 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstrakt

This article contributes to the debate about ideologically motivated planning reforms. It aims to advance the debate by exploring how change is legitimised through forms of rhetorical persuasion. It shows how political ideologies become embedded in planning policies and practices through strategies of legitimation aimed at justifying specific ideas, beliefs and values as self-evident and inevitable. These legitimation strategies rely on distinctive rhetorical appeals to steer planning discourses, policies and institutions. By using short illustrative examples of 'ideology in action' from Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands, the article shows that various combinations of rhetorical appeals to logos, ethos, pathos and doxa (logic, character, emotion and identity) are often simultaneously at work to naturalise contested planning reforms.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPlanning Theory
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)17-37
Antal sider21
ISSN1473-0952
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2020
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Reinventing planning and planners: Ideological decontestations and rhetorical appeals'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater