Review of current study methods for VRU safety: Appendix 7 – Systematic literature review: Self-reported accidents

Camilla Sloth Andersen, Noor Azreena Kamaluddin, András Várhelyi, Tanja Kidholm Osmann Madsen, Katrine Meltofte Møller

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

61 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

The main idea behind the self-reporting of accidents is to ask people about their traffic accidents and gain knowledge on these accidents as a supplement to the official records kept by police and/or hospitals. The ways of getting information from people can vary; people may be asked to fill out written questionnaires (either online or paper-based), interviews may be performed (either face-to-face or via telephone) and people may be asked to report their accident via an app on their mobile device. The method for gaining self-reported information thus varies greatly – and so does the information that people are asked to give. In most studies, only the number of accidents in which the respondent was involved is relevant for the researcher. In other studies, respondents are asked about possible accident causation factors, and some studies deal with respondents’ recall of the accident details. In other words, self-reporting can have many different aims depending on the research question that is being investigated.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedWarsaw
ForlagWarsaw University of Technology
Antal sider35
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Fingerprint

accident
traffic accident
supplement
telephone
literature
police
questionnaire
interview

Emneord

  • InDeV
  • Accidents
  • Self-reported accidents

Citer dette

Andersen, Camilla Sloth ; Kamaluddin, Noor Azreena ; Várhelyi, András ; Madsen, Tanja Kidholm Osmann ; Møller, Katrine Meltofte. / Review of current study methods for VRU safety : Appendix 7 – Systematic literature review: Self-reported accidents. Warsaw : Warsaw University of Technology, 2016. 35 s.
@book{2b3a6a8fcf2443a09ee7f4b6f853c319,
title = "Review of current study methods for VRU safety: Appendix 7 – Systematic literature review: Self-reported accidents",
abstract = "The main idea behind the self-reporting of accidents is to ask people about their traffic accidents and gain knowledge on these accidents as a supplement to the official records kept by police and/or hospitals. The ways of getting information from people can vary; people may be asked to fill out written questionnaires (either online or paper-based), interviews may be performed (either face-to-face or via telephone) and people may be asked to report their accident via an app on their mobile device. The method for gaining self-reported information thus varies greatly – and so does the information that people are asked to give. In most studies, only the number of accidents in which the respondent was involved is relevant for the researcher. In other studies, respondents are asked about possible accident causation factors, and some studies deal with respondents’ recall of the accident details. In other words, self-reporting can have many different aims depending on the research question that is being investigated.",
keywords = "InDeV, Accidents, Self-reported accidents, InDeV, Accidents, Self-reported accidents",
author = "Andersen, {Camilla Sloth} and Kamaluddin, {Noor Azreena} and Andr{\'a}s V{\'a}rhelyi and Madsen, {Tanja Kidholm Osmann} and M{\o}ller, {Katrine Meltofte}",
note = "InDeV: In-Depth understanding of accident causation for Vulnerable road users. HORIZON 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Deliverable 2.1 – part 5 of 5.",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
publisher = "Warsaw University of Technology",

}

Review of current study methods for VRU safety : Appendix 7 – Systematic literature review: Self-reported accidents. / Andersen, Camilla Sloth; Kamaluddin, Noor Azreena; Várhelyi, András; Madsen, Tanja Kidholm Osmann; Møller, Katrine Meltofte.

Warsaw : Warsaw University of Technology, 2016. 35 s.

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

TY - RPRT

T1 - Review of current study methods for VRU safety

T2 - Appendix 7 – Systematic literature review: Self-reported accidents

AU - Andersen, Camilla Sloth

AU - Kamaluddin, Noor Azreena

AU - Várhelyi, András

AU - Madsen, Tanja Kidholm Osmann

AU - Møller, Katrine Meltofte

N1 - InDeV: In-Depth understanding of accident causation for Vulnerable road users. HORIZON 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Deliverable 2.1 – part 5 of 5.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The main idea behind the self-reporting of accidents is to ask people about their traffic accidents and gain knowledge on these accidents as a supplement to the official records kept by police and/or hospitals. The ways of getting information from people can vary; people may be asked to fill out written questionnaires (either online or paper-based), interviews may be performed (either face-to-face or via telephone) and people may be asked to report their accident via an app on their mobile device. The method for gaining self-reported information thus varies greatly – and so does the information that people are asked to give. In most studies, only the number of accidents in which the respondent was involved is relevant for the researcher. In other studies, respondents are asked about possible accident causation factors, and some studies deal with respondents’ recall of the accident details. In other words, self-reporting can have many different aims depending on the research question that is being investigated.

AB - The main idea behind the self-reporting of accidents is to ask people about their traffic accidents and gain knowledge on these accidents as a supplement to the official records kept by police and/or hospitals. The ways of getting information from people can vary; people may be asked to fill out written questionnaires (either online or paper-based), interviews may be performed (either face-to-face or via telephone) and people may be asked to report their accident via an app on their mobile device. The method for gaining self-reported information thus varies greatly – and so does the information that people are asked to give. In most studies, only the number of accidents in which the respondent was involved is relevant for the researcher. In other studies, respondents are asked about possible accident causation factors, and some studies deal with respondents’ recall of the accident details. In other words, self-reporting can have many different aims depending on the research question that is being investigated.

KW - InDeV

KW - Accidents

KW - Self-reported accidents

KW - InDeV

KW - Accidents

KW - Self-reported accidents

UR - http://www.indev-project.eu/InDeV/EN/Documents/pdf/2-1-5.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

M3 - Report

BT - Review of current study methods for VRU safety

PB - Warsaw University of Technology

CY - Warsaw

ER -

Andersen CS, Kamaluddin NA, Várhelyi A, Madsen TKO, Møller KM. Review of current study methods for VRU safety: Appendix 7 – Systematic literature review: Self-reported accidents. Warsaw: Warsaw University of Technology, 2016. 35 s.