TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety climate as a predictor of work ability problems in blue-collar workers
T2 - prospective cohort study
AU - Brandt, Mikkel
AU - Sundstrup, Emil
AU - Andersen, Lars L
AU - Wilstrup, Ninna Maria
AU - Ajslev, Jeppe Z N
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2021/3/2
Y1 - 2021/3/2
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether safety climate items would be predictive of future physical and mental work ability among blue-collar workers.METHODS: Blue-collar workers (n=3822) from the Danish Work Environment and Health study replied to questions on safety climate, physical and mental work ability, and health in 2012 and 2014. Using multivariate logistic regression, we estimated the association of number of safety climate items (0-5) in 2012 with physical and mental work ability in 2014. Potential confounders included sex, age, socioeconomic class, occupational group, lifestyle (smoking habits and body mass index) and previous accidents.RESULTS: In the fully adjusted model, workers reporting two and three or more safety climate problems (reference: 0) had higher risk for reduced physical work ability at follow-up (OR 1.29 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.61] and OR 1.52 [95% CI 1.27 to 1.84], respectively). Similar outcomes were observed for mental work ability. Using number of safety climate items as a continuous variable, a doseresponse association existed both for physical and mental work ability (trend-test <0.0001).CONCLUSION: A dose-response association between the number of safety climate items at baseline and lower physical and mental work ability was detected after 2 years. Safety climate items should be highly prioritised in blue-collar companies.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether safety climate items would be predictive of future physical and mental work ability among blue-collar workers.METHODS: Blue-collar workers (n=3822) from the Danish Work Environment and Health study replied to questions on safety climate, physical and mental work ability, and health in 2012 and 2014. Using multivariate logistic regression, we estimated the association of number of safety climate items (0-5) in 2012 with physical and mental work ability in 2014. Potential confounders included sex, age, socioeconomic class, occupational group, lifestyle (smoking habits and body mass index) and previous accidents.RESULTS: In the fully adjusted model, workers reporting two and three or more safety climate problems (reference: 0) had higher risk for reduced physical work ability at follow-up (OR 1.29 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.61] and OR 1.52 [95% CI 1.27 to 1.84], respectively). Similar outcomes were observed for mental work ability. Using number of safety climate items as a continuous variable, a doseresponse association existed both for physical and mental work ability (trend-test <0.0001).CONCLUSION: A dose-response association between the number of safety climate items at baseline and lower physical and mental work ability was detected after 2 years. Safety climate items should be highly prioritised in blue-collar companies.
KW - epidemiology
KW - health & safety
KW - mental health
KW - occupational & industrial medicine
KW - organisational development
KW - risk management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102037814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040885
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040885
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33653741
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 11
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 3
M1 - e040885
ER -