“So, it is about how negative it is?!”: Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The article argues that interactions in qualitative interviews and ethnography can be analyzed as relations between intersectional social positions. It draws attention to the importance of class and geographical location in such analysis. It further argues that such interactions work through typifications, that they have a power dimension and that they entail processes of identity formation. The identities being offered through these processes can, however, be negotiated or resisted. The article then analyses such interactions as they were experienced in two research projects the author participated in: His PhD project about young
marginalized ethnic minority men, and the collective project INTERLOC which focused on the interplay between gender, class, ethnicity and ‘race’ in an underprivileged Danish suburb. It is demonstrated that relationality influences the assumptions research participants have about the researcher. It is also demonstrated that the research encounter entails powerful mechanism of
identity formation. The informants, however, sometimes resist these processes resulting in blurred and unstable, sometimes antagonistic, power relations. It is finally argued that analyses of such interactions can provide central insight into the subject studied.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftQualitative Studies
Vol/bind3
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)115-132
Antal sider18
ISSN1903-7031
StatusUdgivet - 11 sep. 2012

Emneord

  • Ethnography
  • intersectionality
  • location
  • class
  • gender
  • ethnicity
  • ‘race’
  • typification

Citer dette

@article{a5464d621da644f9a65a25779d2d0642,
title = "“So, it is about how negative it is?!”: Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions",
abstract = "The article argues that interactions in qualitative interviews and ethnography can be analyzed as relations between intersectional social positions. It draws attention to the importance of class and geographical location in such analysis. It further argues that such interactions work through typifications, that they have a power dimension and that they entail processes of identity formation. The identities being offered through these processes can, however, be negotiated or resisted. The article then analyses such interactions as they were experienced in two research projects the author participated in: His PhD project about young marginalized ethnic minority men, and the collective project INTERLOC which focused on the interplay between gender, class, ethnicity and ‘race’ in an underprivileged Danish suburb. It is demonstrated that relationality influences the assumptions research participants have about the researcher. It is also demonstrated that the research encounter entails powerful mechanism of identity formation. The informants, however, sometimes resist these processes resulting in blurred and unstable, sometimes antagonistic, power relations. It is finally argued that analyses of such interactions can provide central insight into the subject studied.",
keywords = "Ethnography, intersectionality, location, class, gender, ethnicity, ‘race’, typification",
author = "Jensen, {Sune Qvotrup}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "115--132",
journal = "Qualitative Studies",
issn = "1903-7031",
publisher = "Aalborg Universitet",
number = "2",

}

“So, it is about how negative it is?!” : Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions. / Jensen, Sune Qvotrup.

I: Qualitative Studies, Bind 3, Nr. 2, 11.09.2012, s. 115-132.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - “So, it is about how negative it is?!”

T2 - Understanding researcher/researched interactions as relations between intersectional social positions

AU - Jensen, Sune Qvotrup

PY - 2012/9/11

Y1 - 2012/9/11

N2 - The article argues that interactions in qualitative interviews and ethnography can be analyzed as relations between intersectional social positions. It draws attention to the importance of class and geographical location in such analysis. It further argues that such interactions work through typifications, that they have a power dimension and that they entail processes of identity formation. The identities being offered through these processes can, however, be negotiated or resisted. The article then analyses such interactions as they were experienced in two research projects the author participated in: His PhD project about young marginalized ethnic minority men, and the collective project INTERLOC which focused on the interplay between gender, class, ethnicity and ‘race’ in an underprivileged Danish suburb. It is demonstrated that relationality influences the assumptions research participants have about the researcher. It is also demonstrated that the research encounter entails powerful mechanism of identity formation. The informants, however, sometimes resist these processes resulting in blurred and unstable, sometimes antagonistic, power relations. It is finally argued that analyses of such interactions can provide central insight into the subject studied.

AB - The article argues that interactions in qualitative interviews and ethnography can be analyzed as relations between intersectional social positions. It draws attention to the importance of class and geographical location in such analysis. It further argues that such interactions work through typifications, that they have a power dimension and that they entail processes of identity formation. The identities being offered through these processes can, however, be negotiated or resisted. The article then analyses such interactions as they were experienced in two research projects the author participated in: His PhD project about young marginalized ethnic minority men, and the collective project INTERLOC which focused on the interplay between gender, class, ethnicity and ‘race’ in an underprivileged Danish suburb. It is demonstrated that relationality influences the assumptions research participants have about the researcher. It is also demonstrated that the research encounter entails powerful mechanism of identity formation. The informants, however, sometimes resist these processes resulting in blurred and unstable, sometimes antagonistic, power relations. It is finally argued that analyses of such interactions can provide central insight into the subject studied.

KW - Ethnography

KW - intersectionality

KW - location

KW - class

KW - gender

KW - ethnicity

KW - ‘race’

KW - typification

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 115

EP - 132

JO - Qualitative Studies

JF - Qualitative Studies

SN - 1903-7031

IS - 2

ER -