Socio-Technical Approaches are Needed for Innovation in Fisheries

Alyne Elizabeth Delaney, David G. Reid, Christopher Zimmermann, Marloes Kraan, Nathalie Steins, Michel J. Kaiser*


Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederpeer review

4 Citationer (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)


We reflect on the innovation process that led to the development of the pulse trawl that was successfully trialed at a commercial scale, but eventually ended with the European Parliament passing legislation to ban its use. The ban was imposed despite published and emerging evidence that suggested that the environmental performance and catch efficiency of the pulse trawl was superior to the conventional beam trawl design. We used a stakeholder questionnaire to understand which factors undermined wider acceptance of the pulse trawl. The main factors where a lack of involvement of certain key stakeholders earlier in the process that would have ensured better co-development of innovation and a shared vision of the environmental or governance questions that needed to be addressed. Although the stakeholder process itself was seen to be positive, it was implemented too late in the innovation process, as was the implementation of an independent peer review process. We conclude by identifying a pathway for future fishing gear innovation processes that integrate the lessons learnt from the pulse trawl innovation process.
TidsskriftReviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)161-179
Antal sider19
StatusUdgivet - 2023


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Socio-Technical Approaches are Needed for Innovation in Fisheries'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.