Teoretisering og anayse af flerstemmighed og dialog i organisations- og ledelsesudviklende praksisser: Diskussion og diskursanalyse af dialogiske praksisser i et forum for ledelsesudvikling

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportPh.d.-afhandlingForskning

553 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

In this thesis Ann Starbæk Bager conducts research on organizational dialogic development practices. She scrutinizes and challenges the taken-for-grantedness of such as naturally positive phenomenon with attached positive, involving and emancipating outcomes. An in depth theorization of dialogue is offered through the lens of Bakhtinian dialogicality assisted by perspectives from Foucauldian governmentality and discourse studies and its implications for organizational and leadership studies are discussed. On this basis an ethnographic inspired analysis (a combined process and embodied discourse analysis) is conducted of dialogic practicing and identity work in a participatory dialogue, dissensus and research based leadership forum hosted in Danish university settings. Among other things the analysis pictures leadership as serious and complex phenomenon filled with ambiguities and paradoxes. It further reveals how in situ dialogic practices mainly are seen to eclipse, instead of the intended ideals of furthering, diversity and plurivocality. Based on analytical findings the author elaborates an ethics of dialogue and discusses an anticipated methodological framework for doing organizational discourse activism that seeks to further co-production of dissensus based and plurivocal knowledge and participatory development of leadership communicative practices.
Bidragets oversatte titelTeoretisering og anayse af flerstemmighed og dialog i organisations- og ledelsesudviklende praksisser: Diskussion og diskursanalyse af dialogiske praksisser i et forum for ledelsesudvikling
OriginalsprogEngelsk
ForlagAalborg Universitetsforlag
Antal sider122
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-87-7112-213-8
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015
NavnPh.d.-serien for Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Aalborg Universitet
ISSN2246-123X

Bibliografisk note

Pirkko Liisa Raudaskoski, Hovedvejleder
Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen, Bivejleder

Citer dette

@phdthesis{7276046b3a014d2b9d81a1a86eea3fb5,
title = "Theorising and analysing plurivocality and dialogue in organizational and leadership development practices: Discussion and discourse analysis of dialogic practices in a leadership development forum",
abstract = "In this thesis Ann Starb{\ae}k Bager conducts research on organizational dialogic development practices. She scrutinizes and challenges the taken-for-grantedness of such as naturally positive phenomenon with attached positive, involving and emancipating outcomes. An in depth theorization of dialogue is offered through the lens of Bakhtinian dialogicality assisted by perspectives from Foucauldian governmentality and discourse studies and its implications for organizational and leadership studies are discussed. On this basis an ethnographic inspired analysis (a combined process and embodied discourse analysis) is conducted of dialogic practicing and identity work in a participatory dialogue, dissensus and research based leadership forum hosted in Danish university settings. Among other things the analysis pictures leadership as serious and complex phenomenon filled with ambiguities and paradoxes. It further reveals how in situ dialogic practices mainly are seen to eclipse, instead of the intended ideals of furthering, diversity and plurivocality. Based on analytical findings the author elaborates an ethics of dialogue and discusses an anticipated methodological framework for doing organizational discourse activism that seeks to further co-production of dissensus based and plurivocal knowledge and participatory development of leadership communicative practices.",
author = "Ann Bager",
note = "Pirkko Liisa Raudaskoski, Hovedvejleder Kenneth M{\o}lbjerg J{\o}rgensen, Bivejleder",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.5278/vbn.phd.hum.00023",
language = "English",
publisher = "Aalborg Universitetsforlag",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Theorising and analysing plurivocality and dialogue in organizational and leadership development practices

T2 - Discussion and discourse analysis of dialogic practices in a leadership development forum

AU - Bager, Ann

N1 - Pirkko Liisa Raudaskoski, Hovedvejleder Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen, Bivejleder

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this thesis Ann Starbæk Bager conducts research on organizational dialogic development practices. She scrutinizes and challenges the taken-for-grantedness of such as naturally positive phenomenon with attached positive, involving and emancipating outcomes. An in depth theorization of dialogue is offered through the lens of Bakhtinian dialogicality assisted by perspectives from Foucauldian governmentality and discourse studies and its implications for organizational and leadership studies are discussed. On this basis an ethnographic inspired analysis (a combined process and embodied discourse analysis) is conducted of dialogic practicing and identity work in a participatory dialogue, dissensus and research based leadership forum hosted in Danish university settings. Among other things the analysis pictures leadership as serious and complex phenomenon filled with ambiguities and paradoxes. It further reveals how in situ dialogic practices mainly are seen to eclipse, instead of the intended ideals of furthering, diversity and plurivocality. Based on analytical findings the author elaborates an ethics of dialogue and discusses an anticipated methodological framework for doing organizational discourse activism that seeks to further co-production of dissensus based and plurivocal knowledge and participatory development of leadership communicative practices.

AB - In this thesis Ann Starbæk Bager conducts research on organizational dialogic development practices. She scrutinizes and challenges the taken-for-grantedness of such as naturally positive phenomenon with attached positive, involving and emancipating outcomes. An in depth theorization of dialogue is offered through the lens of Bakhtinian dialogicality assisted by perspectives from Foucauldian governmentality and discourse studies and its implications for organizational and leadership studies are discussed. On this basis an ethnographic inspired analysis (a combined process and embodied discourse analysis) is conducted of dialogic practicing and identity work in a participatory dialogue, dissensus and research based leadership forum hosted in Danish university settings. Among other things the analysis pictures leadership as serious and complex phenomenon filled with ambiguities and paradoxes. It further reveals how in situ dialogic practices mainly are seen to eclipse, instead of the intended ideals of furthering, diversity and plurivocality. Based on analytical findings the author elaborates an ethics of dialogue and discusses an anticipated methodological framework for doing organizational discourse activism that seeks to further co-production of dissensus based and plurivocal knowledge and participatory development of leadership communicative practices.

U2 - 10.5278/vbn.phd.hum.00023

DO - 10.5278/vbn.phd.hum.00023

M3 - Ph.D. thesis

BT - Theorising and analysing plurivocality and dialogue in organizational and leadership development practices

PB - Aalborg Universitetsforlag

ER -