Abstract
Pakistan and India have historically been at odds with each other politically, and have fought four
wars. Both countries share a water supply via the Indus River, which originates in the disputed territory of Indian-Administred Kashmir. As India is the upper-riparian state it therefore has the advantage to ‘control’ water supply downstream to Pakistan, the lower-riparian state, an Indus Waters
Treaty was signed in 1960 which awarded each country three rivers stemming from the Indus River,
each and regulated the flow of water between the two. However, Pakistan has claimed that the creation of hydropower projects in India on rivers which flow into Pakistan have compromised the supply
of water to Pakistan, which then lowers the amount available primarily for agriculture, power generation and consumptive purposes. Two such issues were raised in the case of 1999 Baglihar Hydroelectric Project and 2007 Kishenganga Hydroelectric Plant, and for both, different mechanisms under
the Indus Waters Treaty were used to resolve the disputes. This article considers the mechanisms of
resolution provided under the Treaty, and comments on its effectiveness in doing so, and in the
process, suggests reform to the Treaty itself.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | The Interdisciplinary Journal of International Studies |
Vol/bind | 10 |
Udgave nummer | 1 |
Sider (fra-til) | 53-69 |
Antal sider | 16 |
ISSN | 1602-9097 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 19 dec. 2020 |
Emneord
- Indus Waters Treaty
- Indus Waters Commussion
- Pakistan-India relations
- hydroelectric power plant
- hydropolitics
- international dispute resolution
- World Bank