TY - JOUR
T1 - The Politics of Rule Development: A Case Study of Australian Pension Fund Accounting Rule‐Making
AU - Klumpes, Paul John Marcel
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Describing the politics surrounding accounting rule development may provide greater insights to such processes than analysing written submissions to rule‐making bodies. Over a twenty‐year period a rule‐making contest evolved between the accounting profession and an alliance of pension industry interest groups over the introduction of different forms of regulation (accounting standards versus legislative‐backed rules) relating to pension fund accounting. From the perspective of government, the debate about pension fund accounting reflects the outside‐initiative model (Cobb and Elder, 1972; Cobb et al., 1976). Issues were created by the (accounting and actuarial) professions, expanded in the relevant (pension and life insurance) industry and then gained entrance to the formal agenda of both regulatory and government deliberations. In this case the accounting profession failed to gain acceptance of its professional rule‐making activities. Alternative possible explanations as to why the alliance of interest groups eventually prevailed over the accounting profession are explored.
AB - Describing the politics surrounding accounting rule development may provide greater insights to such processes than analysing written submissions to rule‐making bodies. Over a twenty‐year period a rule‐making contest evolved between the accounting profession and an alliance of pension industry interest groups over the introduction of different forms of regulation (accounting standards versus legislative‐backed rules) relating to pension fund accounting. From the perspective of government, the debate about pension fund accounting reflects the outside‐initiative model (Cobb and Elder, 1972; Cobb et al., 1976). Issues were created by the (accounting and actuarial) professions, expanded in the relevant (pension and life insurance) industry and then gained entrance to the formal agenda of both regulatory and government deliberations. In this case the accounting profession failed to gain acceptance of its professional rule‐making activities. Alternative possible explanations as to why the alliance of interest groups eventually prevailed over the accounting profession are explored.
KW - pension fund
KW - accounting rule-making
KW - Australia
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1994.tb00347.x
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1994.tb00347.x
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0001-3072
VL - 30
SP - 140
EP - 159
JO - Abacus: A journal of accounting, finance and business studies
JF - Abacus: A journal of accounting, finance and business studies
IS - 2
ER -