TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of modularity in sustainable design
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Sonego, Monique
AU - Echeveste, Márcia Elisa Soares
AU - Galvan Debarba, Henrique
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of CNPq ( Brazilian National Council for Research ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Modularity is a strategy recognized by the academia and the industry, and modular architecture is argued to play an important role in the development of sustainable products. The objective of this article is to explore the intersection between modularity and sustainable design from the perspective of the product life cycle. To achieve this objective, a systematic review was conducted and a total of 81 articles were selected and distributed in seven different categories of subjects: Life Cycle Assessment, Design for X, Green Modularization, Manufacture, Modularization Reviews, Supply Chain, and Usage. We identified in the literature that: (i) benefits are claimed in every life cycle phase (production, use, and disposal); (ii) academic research is mainly focused in the production phase and in projecting product disposal scenarios, offering a wide variety of methods and methodologies to modularize products with environmental concerns. However, modularity could also present limitations, and the realization of its benefits is partially influenced by user's decisions. Our conclusion points that, in spite of the association of modularity with environmental benefits, a better understanding of the entire life cycle of modular products and their environmental impact is needed to decide whether modularization is a suitable sustainable strategy or not.
AB - Modularity is a strategy recognized by the academia and the industry, and modular architecture is argued to play an important role in the development of sustainable products. The objective of this article is to explore the intersection between modularity and sustainable design from the perspective of the product life cycle. To achieve this objective, a systematic review was conducted and a total of 81 articles were selected and distributed in seven different categories of subjects: Life Cycle Assessment, Design for X, Green Modularization, Manufacture, Modularization Reviews, Supply Chain, and Usage. We identified in the literature that: (i) benefits are claimed in every life cycle phase (production, use, and disposal); (ii) academic research is mainly focused in the production phase and in projecting product disposal scenarios, offering a wide variety of methods and methodologies to modularize products with environmental concerns. However, modularity could also present limitations, and the realization of its benefits is partially influenced by user's decisions. Our conclusion points that, in spite of the association of modularity with environmental benefits, a better understanding of the entire life cycle of modular products and their environmental impact is needed to decide whether modularization is a suitable sustainable strategy or not.
KW - Modular design
KW - Modularity
KW - Product development
KW - Sustainable design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040680770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.106
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.106
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85040680770
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 176
SP - 196
EP - 209
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -