TY - JOUR
T1 - The roles of hydrogen energy in ports
T2 - Comparative life-cycle analysis based on hydrogen utilization strategies
AU - Li, Yuxin
AU - Tang, Daogui
AU - Yuan, Chengqing
AU - Diaz-Londono, Cesar
AU - Agundis-Tinajero, Gibran David
AU - Guerrero, Josep M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
PY - 2025/3/6
Y1 - 2025/3/6
N2 - Hydrogen energy is a promising solution for prompting low-carbon port development. This study introduces two hydrogen utilization strategies: hydrogen consumption-driven strategy (HCDS) and hydrogen storage-driven strategy (HSDS). Using data from a real port and a life-cycle assessment approach, a case study is conducted to compare their economic and ecological performances. The results show that HCDS enhances economic benefits, with an annualized cost of 66.1 million CNY, which is 11% lower than HSDS. Additionally, HCDS is sensitive to electricity prices and grid carbon emission factor. In contrast, HSDS offers superior ecological benefits, with an annualized carbon footprint of 31,300 tons of CO₂, which is 12% lower than HCDS, and is mainly sensitive to purchase prices and emission factors of electricity and hydrogen. This study provides critical insights into the trade-offs between economic and ecological performance under different hydrogen utilization strategies, offering practical guidance for implementing hydrogen energy system applications in ports.
AB - Hydrogen energy is a promising solution for prompting low-carbon port development. This study introduces two hydrogen utilization strategies: hydrogen consumption-driven strategy (HCDS) and hydrogen storage-driven strategy (HSDS). Using data from a real port and a life-cycle assessment approach, a case study is conducted to compare their economic and ecological performances. The results show that HCDS enhances economic benefits, with an annualized cost of 66.1 million CNY, which is 11% lower than HSDS. Additionally, HCDS is sensitive to electricity prices and grid carbon emission factor. In contrast, HSDS offers superior ecological benefits, with an annualized carbon footprint of 31,300 tons of CO₂, which is 12% lower than HCDS, and is mainly sensitive to purchase prices and emission factors of electricity and hydrogen. This study provides critical insights into the trade-offs between economic and ecological performance under different hydrogen utilization strategies, offering practical guidance for implementing hydrogen energy system applications in ports.
KW - Fuel cells
KW - Hydrogen energy
KW - Hydrogen utilization strategies
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Ports
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217081939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.075
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.075
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85217081939
SN - 0360-3199
VL - 106
SP - 1356
EP - 1372
JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
ER -