Towards harmonizing natural resources as an area of protection in life cycle impact assessment

Thomas Sonderegger*, Jo Dewulf, Peter Fantke, Danielle Maia de Souza, Stephan Pfister, Franziska Stoessel, Francesca Verones, Marisa Vieira, Bo Weidema, Stefanie Hellweg


Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

61 Citationer (Scopus)
224 Downloads (Pure)


Purpose: In this paper, we summarize the discussion and present the findings of an expert group effort under the umbrella of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative proposing natural resources as an Area of Protection (AoP) in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). Methods: As a first step, natural resources have been defined for the LCA context with reference to the overall UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) framework. Second, existing LCIA methods have been reviewed and discussed. The reviewed methods have been evaluated according to the considered type of natural resources and their underlying principles followed (use-to-availability ratios, backup technology approaches, or thermodynamic accounting methods). Results and discussion: There is currently no single LCIA method available that addresses impacts for all natural resource categories, nor do existing methods and models addressing different natural resource categories do so in a consistent way across categories. Exceptions are exergy and solar energy-related methods, which cover the widest range of resource categories. However, these methods do not link exergy consumption to changes in availability or provisioning capacity of a specific natural resource (e.g., mineral, water, land etc.). So far, there is no agreement in the scientific community on the most relevant type of future resource indicators (depletion, increased energy use or cost due to resource extraction, etc.). To address this challenge, a framework based on the concept of stock/fund/flow resources is proposed to identify, across natural resource categories, whether depletion/dissipation (of stocks and funds) or competition (for flows) is the main relevant aspect. Conclusions: An LCIA method—or a set of methods—that consistently address all natural resource categories is needed in order to avoid burden shifting from the impact associated with one resource to the impact associated with another resource. This paper is an important basis for a step forward in the direction of consistently integrating the various natural resources as an Area of Protection into LCA.

TidsskriftInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)1912–1927
Antal sider16
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2017


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Towards harmonizing natural resources as an area of protection in life cycle impact assessment'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.