Transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region:: towards a territorial governance approach?

John R. Moodie; Michael Kull; Elin Cedergren; Alberto Giacometti; Andrea Morf; Søren Qvist Eliasen; Lise Schrøder

doi:10.1007/s40152-020-00211-0

Transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region: towards a territorial governance approach?

John R. Moodie^*, Michael Kull, Elin Cedergren, Alberto Giacometti, Andrea Morf, Søren Qvist Eliasen, Lise Schrøder

^*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

7 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines whether the concept of territorial governance (TG) accurately captures the nature of governance and policymaking in transboundary marine spatial planning (TMSP) activities in the Baltic Sea Region. The focus of analysis is on the DG Mare–funded Baltic SCOPE and Pan Baltic Scope projects, which brought together key marine spatial planning stakeholders in the Baltic Sea Region to find solutions to TMSP issues. The five key dimensions of TG are examined against the transboundary collaborations undertaken during these two projects. The article finds that TMSP in the Baltic Sea Region shares many of the key characteristics of TG, such as, promoting learning and establishing stronger links between institutions, sectors and stakeholders; however, the TG concept fails to accurately capture the power dynamics at play in TMSP, particularly the central role of national planning authorities and certain sea use sectors in determining the overall direction of policy.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Maritime Studies
Vol/bind	20
Sider (fra-til)	27-41
Antal sider	15
ISSN	1872-7859
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00211-0
Status	Udgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We warmly thank the journal editors and reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments which improved the paper immeasurably. The present work has been carried out within the project ‘Baltic Sea Maritime Spatial Planning for Sustainable Ecosystem Services (BONUS BASMATI)’, which has received funding from BONUS (art. 185), funded jointly by the EU, Innovation Fund Denmark, Swedish Research Council Formas, Academy of Finland, Latvian Ministry of Education and Science and Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (Germany). Call number: call2015-77.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1007/s40152-020-00211-0

AUB Link

Søg efter materialet i Aalborg Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

7 Citationer
1 Rapport

Handbook: Process, Methods and Tools for Stakeholder Involvement in MSP. BONUS BASMATI Deliverable 2.3.
Bidragets oversatte titel: Håndbook: Processer, Metoder og redskaber for involvering af interessenter i MSP (Maritim Rumlig Planlægning). Giacometti, A., Morf, A., Gee, K., Kull, M., Luhtala, H., Eliasen, S. Q. & Cedergren, E., sep. 2020, 76 s.
Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapport › Rapport › Formidling

Åben adgang
Fil

Citationsformater

@article{b0e511c789ae4d59a4ffe93b5336cbc9,

title = "Transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region:: towards a territorial governance approach?",

abstract = "This article examines whether the concept of territorial governance (TG) accurately captures the nature of governance and policymaking in transboundary marine spatial planning (TMSP) activities in the Baltic Sea Region. The focus of analysis is on the DG Mare–funded Baltic SCOPE and Pan Baltic Scope projects, which brought together key marine spatial planning stakeholders in the Baltic Sea Region to find solutions to TMSP issues. The five key dimensions of TG are examined against the transboundary collaborations undertaken during these two projects. The article finds that TMSP in the Baltic Sea Region shares many of the key characteristics of TG, such as, promoting learning and establishing stronger links between institutions, sectors and stakeholders; however, the TG concept fails to accurately capture the power dynamics at play in TMSP, particularly the central role of national planning authorities and certain sea use sectors in determining the overall direction of policy.",

author = "Moodie, {John R.} and Michael Kull and Elin Cedergren and Alberto Giacometti and Andrea Morf and Eliasen, {S{\o}ren Qvist} and Lise Schr{\o}der",

note = "Funding Information: We warmly thank the journal editors and reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments which improved the paper immeasurably. The present work has been carried out within the project {\textquoteleft}Baltic Sea Maritime Spatial Planning for Sustainable Ecosystem Services (BONUS BASMATI){\textquoteright}, which has received funding from BONUS (art. 185), funded jointly by the EU, Innovation Fund Denmark, Swedish Research Council Formas, Academy of Finland, Latvian Ministry of Education and Science and Forschungszentrum J{\"u}lich GmbH (Germany). Call number: call2015-77. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1007/s40152-020-00211-0",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "27--41",

journal = "Maritime Studies",

issn = "1872-7859",

publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region:

T2 - towards a territorial governance approach?

AU - Moodie, John R.

AU - Kull, Michael

AU - Cedergren, Elin

AU - Giacometti, Alberto

AU - Morf, Andrea

AU - Eliasen, Søren Qvist

AU - Schrøder, Lise

N1 - Funding Information: We warmly thank the journal editors and reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments which improved the paper immeasurably. The present work has been carried out within the project ‘Baltic Sea Maritime Spatial Planning for Sustainable Ecosystem Services (BONUS BASMATI)’, which has received funding from BONUS (art. 185), funded jointly by the EU, Innovation Fund Denmark, Swedish Research Council Formas, Academy of Finland, Latvian Ministry of Education and Science and Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (Germany). Call number: call2015-77. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This article examines whether the concept of territorial governance (TG) accurately captures the nature of governance and policymaking in transboundary marine spatial planning (TMSP) activities in the Baltic Sea Region. The focus of analysis is on the DG Mare–funded Baltic SCOPE and Pan Baltic Scope projects, which brought together key marine spatial planning stakeholders in the Baltic Sea Region to find solutions to TMSP issues. The five key dimensions of TG are examined against the transboundary collaborations undertaken during these two projects. The article finds that TMSP in the Baltic Sea Region shares many of the key characteristics of TG, such as, promoting learning and establishing stronger links between institutions, sectors and stakeholders; however, the TG concept fails to accurately capture the power dynamics at play in TMSP, particularly the central role of national planning authorities and certain sea use sectors in determining the overall direction of policy.

AB - This article examines whether the concept of territorial governance (TG) accurately captures the nature of governance and policymaking in transboundary marine spatial planning (TMSP) activities in the Baltic Sea Region. The focus of analysis is on the DG Mare–funded Baltic SCOPE and Pan Baltic Scope projects, which brought together key marine spatial planning stakeholders in the Baltic Sea Region to find solutions to TMSP issues. The five key dimensions of TG are examined against the transboundary collaborations undertaken during these two projects. The article finds that TMSP in the Baltic Sea Region shares many of the key characteristics of TG, such as, promoting learning and establishing stronger links between institutions, sectors and stakeholders; however, the TG concept fails to accurately capture the power dynamics at play in TMSP, particularly the central role of national planning authorities and certain sea use sectors in determining the overall direction of policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098574136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40152-020-00211-0

DO - 10.1007/s40152-020-00211-0

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85098574136

SN - 1872-7859

VL - 20

SP - 27

EP - 41

JO - Maritime Studies

JF - Maritime Studies

ER -