TY - JOUR
T1 - Valuable insights into general practice staff's experiences and perspectives on AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening-An interview study
AU - Krogh, Malene
AU - Hentze, Malene
AU - Jensen, Morten Sig Ager
AU - Jensen, Martin Bach
AU - Nielsen, Marie Germund
AU - Vorum, Henrik
AU - Kolding Kristensen, Jette
N1 - Copyright © 2025 Krogh, Hentze, Jensen, Jensen, Nielsen, Vorum and Kolding Kristensen.
PY - 2025/3/11
Y1 - 2025/3/11
N2 - AIM: This study explores the hands-on experiences and perspectives of general practice staff regarding the feasibility of conducting artificial intelligence-assisted (AI-assisted) diabetic retinopathy screenings (DRS) in general practice settings.METHOD: The screenings were tested in 12 general practices in the North Denmark Region and were conducted as part of daily care routines over ~4 weeks. Subsequently, 21 staff members involved in the DRS were interviewed.RESULTS: Thematic analysis generated four main themes: (1) Experiences with DRS in daily practice, (2) Effective DRS implementation in general practice in the future, (3) Trust and approval of AI-assisted DRS in general practice, and (4) Implications of DRS in general practice. The findings suggest that general practice staff recognise the potential for AI-assisted DRS to be integrated into their clinical workflows. However, they also emphasise the importance of addressing both practical and systemic factors to ensure successful implementation of DRS within the general practice setting.CONCLUSION: Focusing on the practical experiences and perspectives of general practice staff, this study lays the groundwork for future research aimed at optimising the implementation of AI-assisted DRS in general practice settings, while recognising that the insights gained may also inform broader primary care contexts.
AB - AIM: This study explores the hands-on experiences and perspectives of general practice staff regarding the feasibility of conducting artificial intelligence-assisted (AI-assisted) diabetic retinopathy screenings (DRS) in general practice settings.METHOD: The screenings were tested in 12 general practices in the North Denmark Region and were conducted as part of daily care routines over ~4 weeks. Subsequently, 21 staff members involved in the DRS were interviewed.RESULTS: Thematic analysis generated four main themes: (1) Experiences with DRS in daily practice, (2) Effective DRS implementation in general practice in the future, (3) Trust and approval of AI-assisted DRS in general practice, and (4) Implications of DRS in general practice. The findings suggest that general practice staff recognise the potential for AI-assisted DRS to be integrated into their clinical workflows. However, they also emphasise the importance of addressing both practical and systemic factors to ensure successful implementation of DRS within the general practice setting.CONCLUSION: Focusing on the practical experiences and perspectives of general practice staff, this study lays the groundwork for future research aimed at optimising the implementation of AI-assisted DRS in general practice settings, while recognising that the insights gained may also inform broader primary care contexts.
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Machine Learning
KW - Primary Care
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - diabetic retinopathy screening
KW - stakeholder perspectives
KW - primary care
KW - qualitative research
KW - machine learning
KW - artificial intelligence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001023964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmed.2025.1565532
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2025.1565532
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40134918
SN - 2296-858X
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Medicine
M1 - 1565532
ER -