What Does It Take to Become a Good Engineer? Identifying Cross-National Engineering Student Profiles According to Perceived Importance of Skills

S. Haase, H. L. Chen, S. Sheppard, Anette Kolmos, N. Mejlgaard

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

12 Citationer (Scopus)

Resumé

Engineers of the future are expected to possess a range of competencies in addition to math and science skills. This paper turns to engineering students to explore what they think it takes to become a good engineer. Profiles are identified by means of a large-scale survey-based investigation of the perceptions of first year engineering students in the US and in Denmark
with respect to the importance of math/science skills and interpersonal and professional skills for successful engineering. Four groups of first year engineering students are defined according to combinations of high and low importance assessments of each of the two skill types in both countries. This leads to analytically derived groups emphasizing math/science skills, interpersonal and professional skills, both skill types, and none of the skills. Differences and similarities between these groups are explored in terms of relative group sizes and gender composition, levels of confidence, and
motivation to study engineering. The findings show that the four engineering student groups have distinct profiles with different characteristics in terms of motivation and confidence and which may each require different educational
approaches to become broad thinking engineers. Apart from the exploratory investigation of group differences within each country, the paper also examines whether the four group profiles are nationally confined or if common tendencies
shared by engineering students in both countries exist. The paper contributes to the literature on engineering education and serves to inform engineering educators and institutions worldwide with new insights into the expectations and perceptions of actual students who are at the very beginning of their pathway to an engineering education.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Engineering Education
Vol/bind29
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)698-713
ISSN0949-149X
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Citer dette

@article{7806226a4d1543e0a31400103e8a4738,
title = "What Does It Take to Become a Good Engineer?: Identifying Cross-National Engineering Student Profiles According to Perceived Importance of Skills",
abstract = "Engineers of the future are expected to possess a range of competencies in addition to math and science skills. This paper turns to engineering students to explore what they think it takes to become a good engineer. Profiles are identified by means of a large-scale survey-based investigation of the perceptions of first year engineering students in the US and in Denmarkwith respect to the importance of math/science skills and interpersonal and professional skills for successful engineering. Four groups of first year engineering students are defined according to combinations of high and low importance assessments of each of the two skill types in both countries. This leads to analytically derived groups emphasizing math/science skills, interpersonal and professional skills, both skill types, and none of the skills. Differences and similarities between these groups are explored in terms of relative group sizes and gender composition, levels of confidence, andmotivation to study engineering. The findings show that the four engineering student groups have distinct profiles with different characteristics in terms of motivation and confidence and which may each require different educationalapproaches to become broad thinking engineers. Apart from the exploratory investigation of group differences within each country, the paper also examines whether the four group profiles are nationally confined or if common tendenciesshared by engineering students in both countries exist. The paper contributes to the literature on engineering education and serves to inform engineering educators and institutions worldwide with new insights into the expectations and perceptions of actual students who are at the very beginning of their pathway to an engineering education.",
author = "S. Haase and Chen, {H. L.} and S. Sheppard and Anette Kolmos and N. Mejlgaard",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "698--713",
journal = "International Journal of Engineering Education",
issn = "0949-149X",
publisher = "Dublin Institute of Technology Tempus Publications",
number = "3",

}

What Does It Take to Become a Good Engineer? Identifying Cross-National Engineering Student Profiles According to Perceived Importance of Skills. / Haase, S.; Chen, H. L. ; Sheppard, S. ; Kolmos, Anette; Mejlgaard, N.

I: International Journal of Engineering Education, Bind 29, Nr. 3, 2013, s. 698-713.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Does It Take to Become a Good Engineer?

T2 - Identifying Cross-National Engineering Student Profiles According to Perceived Importance of Skills

AU - Haase, S.

AU - Chen, H. L.

AU - Sheppard, S.

AU - Kolmos, Anette

AU - Mejlgaard, N.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Engineers of the future are expected to possess a range of competencies in addition to math and science skills. This paper turns to engineering students to explore what they think it takes to become a good engineer. Profiles are identified by means of a large-scale survey-based investigation of the perceptions of first year engineering students in the US and in Denmarkwith respect to the importance of math/science skills and interpersonal and professional skills for successful engineering. Four groups of first year engineering students are defined according to combinations of high and low importance assessments of each of the two skill types in both countries. This leads to analytically derived groups emphasizing math/science skills, interpersonal and professional skills, both skill types, and none of the skills. Differences and similarities between these groups are explored in terms of relative group sizes and gender composition, levels of confidence, andmotivation to study engineering. The findings show that the four engineering student groups have distinct profiles with different characteristics in terms of motivation and confidence and which may each require different educationalapproaches to become broad thinking engineers. Apart from the exploratory investigation of group differences within each country, the paper also examines whether the four group profiles are nationally confined or if common tendenciesshared by engineering students in both countries exist. The paper contributes to the literature on engineering education and serves to inform engineering educators and institutions worldwide with new insights into the expectations and perceptions of actual students who are at the very beginning of their pathway to an engineering education.

AB - Engineers of the future are expected to possess a range of competencies in addition to math and science skills. This paper turns to engineering students to explore what they think it takes to become a good engineer. Profiles are identified by means of a large-scale survey-based investigation of the perceptions of first year engineering students in the US and in Denmarkwith respect to the importance of math/science skills and interpersonal and professional skills for successful engineering. Four groups of first year engineering students are defined according to combinations of high and low importance assessments of each of the two skill types in both countries. This leads to analytically derived groups emphasizing math/science skills, interpersonal and professional skills, both skill types, and none of the skills. Differences and similarities between these groups are explored in terms of relative group sizes and gender composition, levels of confidence, andmotivation to study engineering. The findings show that the four engineering student groups have distinct profiles with different characteristics in terms of motivation and confidence and which may each require different educationalapproaches to become broad thinking engineers. Apart from the exploratory investigation of group differences within each country, the paper also examines whether the four group profiles are nationally confined or if common tendenciesshared by engineering students in both countries exist. The paper contributes to the literature on engineering education and serves to inform engineering educators and institutions worldwide with new insights into the expectations and perceptions of actual students who are at the very beginning of their pathway to an engineering education.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 698

EP - 713

JO - International Journal of Engineering Education

JF - International Journal of Engineering Education

SN - 0949-149X

IS - 3

ER -