What Happened to Remote Usability Testing? An Empirical Study of Three Methods

Jan Stage, M. S. Andreasen, H. V. Nielsen, S. O. Schrøder

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

83 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstrakt

The idea of conducting usability tests remotely emerged ten
years ago. Since then, it has been studied empirically, and
some software organizations employ remote methods. Yet
there are still few comparisons involving more than one
remote method. This paper presents results from a
systematic empirical comparison of three methods for
remote usability testing and a conventional laboratorybased
think-aloud method. The three remote methods are a
remote synchronous condition, where testing is conducted
in real time but the test monitor is separated spatially from
the test subjects, and two remote asynchronous conditions,
where the test monitor and the test subjects are separated
both spatially and temporally.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelProceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007 (CHI 2007) :
RedaktørerB. Begole, et al
ForlagAssociation for Computing Machinery
Publikationsdato2007
Sider1405-1414
ISBN (Trykt)978-1-59593-593-9
StatusUdgivet - 2007
BegivenhedConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007 - New York, USA
Varighed: 28 apr. 20073 maj 2007

Konference

KonferenceConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007
LandUSA
ByNew York
Periode28/04/200703/05/2007

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'What Happened to Remote Usability Testing? An Empirical Study of Three Methods'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater