Abstract
The idea of conducting usability tests remotely emerged ten
years ago. Since then, it has been studied empirically, and
some software organizations employ remote methods. Yet
there are still few comparisons involving more than one
remote method. This paper presents results from a
systematic empirical comparison of three methods for
remote usability testing and a conventional laboratorybased
think-aloud method. The three remote methods are a
remote synchronous condition, where testing is conducted
in real time but the test monitor is separated spatially from
the test subjects, and two remote asynchronous conditions,
where the test monitor and the test subjects are separated
both spatially and temporally.
years ago. Since then, it has been studied empirically, and
some software organizations employ remote methods. Yet
there are still few comparisons involving more than one
remote method. This paper presents results from a
systematic empirical comparison of three methods for
remote usability testing and a conventional laboratorybased
think-aloud method. The three remote methods are a
remote synchronous condition, where testing is conducted
in real time but the test monitor is separated spatially from
the test subjects, and two remote asynchronous conditions,
where the test monitor and the test subjects are separated
both spatially and temporally.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007 (CHI 2007) : |
| Redaktører | B. Begole, et al |
| Forlag | Association for Computing Machinery |
| Publikationsdato | 2007 |
| Sider | 1405-1414 |
| ISBN (Trykt) | 978-1-59593-593-9 |
| Status | Udgivet - 2007 |
| Begivenhed | Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007 - New York, USA Varighed: 28 apr. 2007 → 3 maj 2007 |
Konference
| Konference | Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007 |
|---|---|
| Land/Område | USA |
| By | New York |
| Periode | 28/04/2007 → 03/05/2007 |