Abstract
In this article, we analyse one of the most famous recent thought-experiments in philosophy, namely Donald Davidson's Swampman. Engaging recent commentators on Davidson's Swampman as well as analysing the spatio-temporal conditions of the thought-experiment, we will show how the ‘experiment’ inevitably fails. For it doesn't take seriously some of its own defining characteristics: crucially, Swampman's creation of a sudden in a place distinct from Davidson's. Instead of denigrating philosophical thought-experiments per se, our analysis points towards considering thought-experiments in a different sense: imaginary scenarios helpfully self-deconstructing rather than constituting substantive philosophical resources.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Philosophical Investigations |
| Vol/bind | 42 |
| Udgave nummer | 4 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 350-366 |
| Antal sider | 17 |
| ISSN | 0190-0536 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2019 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Why ‘Swampman’ would not even get as far as thinking it was Davidson: On the spatio-temporal basis of Davidson’s conjuring trick'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver