Working environment interventions – Bridging the gap between policy instruments and practice

Peter Hasle, Hans Jørgen Limborg, Klaus T. Nielsen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    23 Citationer (Scopus)
    356 Downloads (Pure)

    Resumé

    In spite of progress in intervention research, our understanding of the transformation of knowledge from
    the research into national working environment programmes is limited. Research in state regulation is
    mainly aimed at compliance and efficiency of public administration, while little attention is paid to
    why and how public and private organisations subsequently are to improve their working environment.
    This paper suggests a model which can bridge this gap. It is based on a combination of theories about
    basic policy instruments (regulation, incentives and information) with realistic analysis focusing on
    mechanisms and context, and finally institutional theory proposing coercive, normative and mimetic
    mechanisms as explanations for organisational behaviour.
    The model is applied to an intervention aimed at reduction of the risk of musculoskeletal disorders
    among bricklayers in Denmark. Our analysis of the case shows how various actors, including the authorities,
    employers, unions and bi-partite committees, developed a programme combining the policy instruments
    over a considerable period of time and that all three institutional mechanisms affected the
    outcome. This integration of various actors and instruments, which was not necessarily planned from
    the beginning, proved to be an effective way of facilitating the implementation of new preventive
    measures in bricklaying. The analysis also indicates new intermediary mechanisms, such as programme
    development, as an iterative process, and the importance of joint messages from employers and unions.
    The model thus provides new insights into the relationship between policy instruments and workplace
    health and safety outcomes.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftSafety Science
    Vol/bind68
    Sider (fra-til)73-80
    Antal sider8
    ISSN0925-7535
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2014

    Fingerprint

    employer
    Research
    Public administration
    regulation
    organizational behavior
    Denmark
    Risk Reduction Behavior
    public administration
    Workplace
    Compliance
    Motivation
    workplace
    Joints
    incentive
    Health
    Organizations
    Safety
    efficiency
    health
    time

    Emneord

    • Institutional Theory
    • Realist analysis
    • Mechanism
    • Bricklaying

    Citer dette

    @article{60d6181dca1c4f038011581ab473728e,
    title = "Working environment interventions – Bridging the gap between policy instruments and practice",
    abstract = "In spite of progress in intervention research, our understanding of the transformation of knowledge from the research into national working environment programmes is limited. Research in state regulation is mainly aimed at compliance and efficiency of public administration, while little attention is paid to why and how public and private organisations subsequently are to improve their working environment. This paper suggests a model which can bridge this gap. It is based on a combination of theories about basic policy instruments (regulation, incentives and information) with realistic analysis focusing onmechanisms and context, and finally institutional theory proposing coercive, normative and mimetic mechanisms as explanations for organisational behaviour.The model is applied to an intervention aimed at reduction of the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among bricklayers in Denmark. Our analysis of the case shows how various actors, including the authorities, employers, unions and bi-partite committees, developed a programme combining the policy instrumentsover a considerable period of time and that all three institutional mechanisms affected the outcome. This integration of various actors and instruments, which was not necessarily planned from the beginning, proved to be an effective way of facilitating the implementation of new preventive measures in bricklaying. The analysis also indicates new intermediary mechanisms, such as programmedevelopment, as an iterative process, and the importance of joint messages from employers and unions. The model thus provides new insights into the relationship between policy instruments and workplace health and safety outcomes.",
    keywords = "Institutional Theory, Realist analysis, Mechanism, Bricklaying",
    author = "Peter Hasle and Limborg, {Hans J{\o}rgen} and Nielsen, {Klaus T.}",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.014",
    language = "English",
    volume = "68",
    pages = "73--80",
    journal = "Safety Science",
    issn = "0925-7535",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Working environment interventions – Bridging the gap between policy instruments and practice. / Hasle, Peter; Limborg, Hans Jørgen; Nielsen, Klaus T.

    I: Safety Science, Bind 68, 2014, s. 73-80.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Working environment interventions – Bridging the gap between policy instruments and practice

    AU - Hasle, Peter

    AU - Limborg, Hans Jørgen

    AU - Nielsen, Klaus T.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - In spite of progress in intervention research, our understanding of the transformation of knowledge from the research into national working environment programmes is limited. Research in state regulation is mainly aimed at compliance and efficiency of public administration, while little attention is paid to why and how public and private organisations subsequently are to improve their working environment. This paper suggests a model which can bridge this gap. It is based on a combination of theories about basic policy instruments (regulation, incentives and information) with realistic analysis focusing onmechanisms and context, and finally institutional theory proposing coercive, normative and mimetic mechanisms as explanations for organisational behaviour.The model is applied to an intervention aimed at reduction of the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among bricklayers in Denmark. Our analysis of the case shows how various actors, including the authorities, employers, unions and bi-partite committees, developed a programme combining the policy instrumentsover a considerable period of time and that all three institutional mechanisms affected the outcome. This integration of various actors and instruments, which was not necessarily planned from the beginning, proved to be an effective way of facilitating the implementation of new preventive measures in bricklaying. The analysis also indicates new intermediary mechanisms, such as programmedevelopment, as an iterative process, and the importance of joint messages from employers and unions. The model thus provides new insights into the relationship between policy instruments and workplace health and safety outcomes.

    AB - In spite of progress in intervention research, our understanding of the transformation of knowledge from the research into national working environment programmes is limited. Research in state regulation is mainly aimed at compliance and efficiency of public administration, while little attention is paid to why and how public and private organisations subsequently are to improve their working environment. This paper suggests a model which can bridge this gap. It is based on a combination of theories about basic policy instruments (regulation, incentives and information) with realistic analysis focusing onmechanisms and context, and finally institutional theory proposing coercive, normative and mimetic mechanisms as explanations for organisational behaviour.The model is applied to an intervention aimed at reduction of the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among bricklayers in Denmark. Our analysis of the case shows how various actors, including the authorities, employers, unions and bi-partite committees, developed a programme combining the policy instrumentsover a considerable period of time and that all three institutional mechanisms affected the outcome. This integration of various actors and instruments, which was not necessarily planned from the beginning, proved to be an effective way of facilitating the implementation of new preventive measures in bricklaying. The analysis also indicates new intermediary mechanisms, such as programmedevelopment, as an iterative process, and the importance of joint messages from employers and unions. The model thus provides new insights into the relationship between policy instruments and workplace health and safety outcomes.

    KW - Institutional Theory

    KW - Realist analysis

    KW - Mechanism

    KW - Bricklaying

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.014

    DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.014

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 68

    SP - 73

    EP - 80

    JO - Safety Science

    JF - Safety Science

    SN - 0925-7535

    ER -