A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Kenya, though not at war, is not at peace. The violence that erupted after the disputed elections in Kenya in the year 2007 aptly revealed this predicament. The conflict is partly rooted in the varying number and nature of historical injustices; land grabbing, economic marginalization, political assassinations, killings, torture, denial of basic needs, and other kinds of human rights abuses perpetrated under successive regimes since the country´s independence in 1963. The truth, justice and reconciliation process, whose report was presented to the president on May 21, 2013, after four years of work, was an attempt resolve this enigma and restore the country towards peace and stability. However, marginal success has been registered to date. Adopting a critical approach to inquiry this paper applies John Gaventa´s analysis of power and power asymmetries to examine the truth process agenda in Kenya. Taking it from this prism the paper first traces the roots of the conflict revealing the web of intricacies in the conflict. The paper examines decision making around the truth process and the power asymmetries therein. This is done against the parameters of how the elite continue to create quiescence amongst the populace and their intent on maintaining status quo. An analysis of documents, reports, newspaper articles as well as interviews purposively sampled and conducted between June - September, 2015 in Uasin Gishu, Wajir, Nairobi and Trans-nzoia, and Kericho counties, have been used as sources of data. The paper concludes that the approach so far taken is compromised for elite motivated political purposes and may not foster reconciliation and build a stable Kenya. In so doing the paper contributes to intellectual debate around truth commissions and their role in promoting democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy
Publication date2016
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventSeminar on Stability, Democracy and Rights in Kenya - Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya
Duration: 7 Dec 20158 Dec 2015

Conference

ConferenceSeminar on Stability, Democracy and Rights in Kenya
LocationMaseno University
CountryKenya
CityMaseno
Period07/12/201508/12/2015

Fingerprint

reconciliation
Kenya
justice
asymmetry
peace
basic need
torture
political elite
newspaper
human rights
president
elite
abuse
election
regime
violence
democracy
decision making
interview
economics

Cite this

Owiso, M. (2016). A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda. In BSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy
Owiso, Michael. / A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda. BSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy. 2016.
@inbook{759e98e906e84dc99e0267d57694a180,
title = "A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda",
abstract = "Kenya, though not at war, is not at peace. The violence that erupted after the disputed elections in Kenya in the year 2007 aptly revealed this predicament. The conflict is partly rooted in the varying number and nature of historical injustices; land grabbing, economic marginalization, political assassinations, killings, torture, denial of basic needs, and other kinds of human rights abuses perpetrated under successive regimes since the country´s independence in 1963. The truth, justice and reconciliation process, whose report was presented to the president on May 21, 2013, after four years of work, was an attempt resolve this enigma and restore the country towards peace and stability. However, marginal success has been registered to date. Adopting a critical approach to inquiry this paper applies John Gaventa´s analysis of power and power asymmetries to examine the truth process agenda in Kenya. Taking it from this prism the paper first traces the roots of the conflict revealing the web of intricacies in the conflict. The paper examines decision making around the truth process and the power asymmetries therein. This is done against the parameters of how the elite continue to create quiescence amongst the populace and their intent on maintaining status quo. An analysis of documents, reports, newspaper articles as well as interviews purposively sampled and conducted between June - September, 2015 in Uasin Gishu, Wajir, Nairobi and Trans-nzoia, and Kericho counties, have been used as sources of data. The paper concludes that the approach so far taken is compromised for elite motivated political purposes and may not foster reconciliation and build a stable Kenya. In so doing the paper contributes to intellectual debate around truth commissions and their role in promoting democracy.",
author = "Michael Owiso",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
booktitle = "BSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy",

}

Owiso, M 2016, A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda. in BSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy. Seminar on Stability, Democracy and Rights in Kenya, Maseno, Kenya, 07/12/2015.

A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda. / Owiso, Michael.

BSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy. 2016.

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingResearchpeer-review

TY - ABST

T1 - A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda

AU - Owiso, Michael

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Kenya, though not at war, is not at peace. The violence that erupted after the disputed elections in Kenya in the year 2007 aptly revealed this predicament. The conflict is partly rooted in the varying number and nature of historical injustices; land grabbing, economic marginalization, political assassinations, killings, torture, denial of basic needs, and other kinds of human rights abuses perpetrated under successive regimes since the country´s independence in 1963. The truth, justice and reconciliation process, whose report was presented to the president on May 21, 2013, after four years of work, was an attempt resolve this enigma and restore the country towards peace and stability. However, marginal success has been registered to date. Adopting a critical approach to inquiry this paper applies John Gaventa´s analysis of power and power asymmetries to examine the truth process agenda in Kenya. Taking it from this prism the paper first traces the roots of the conflict revealing the web of intricacies in the conflict. The paper examines decision making around the truth process and the power asymmetries therein. This is done against the parameters of how the elite continue to create quiescence amongst the populace and their intent on maintaining status quo. An analysis of documents, reports, newspaper articles as well as interviews purposively sampled and conducted between June - September, 2015 in Uasin Gishu, Wajir, Nairobi and Trans-nzoia, and Kericho counties, have been used as sources of data. The paper concludes that the approach so far taken is compromised for elite motivated political purposes and may not foster reconciliation and build a stable Kenya. In so doing the paper contributes to intellectual debate around truth commissions and their role in promoting democracy.

AB - Kenya, though not at war, is not at peace. The violence that erupted after the disputed elections in Kenya in the year 2007 aptly revealed this predicament. The conflict is partly rooted in the varying number and nature of historical injustices; land grabbing, economic marginalization, political assassinations, killings, torture, denial of basic needs, and other kinds of human rights abuses perpetrated under successive regimes since the country´s independence in 1963. The truth, justice and reconciliation process, whose report was presented to the president on May 21, 2013, after four years of work, was an attempt resolve this enigma and restore the country towards peace and stability. However, marginal success has been registered to date. Adopting a critical approach to inquiry this paper applies John Gaventa´s analysis of power and power asymmetries to examine the truth process agenda in Kenya. Taking it from this prism the paper first traces the roots of the conflict revealing the web of intricacies in the conflict. The paper examines decision making around the truth process and the power asymmetries therein. This is done against the parameters of how the elite continue to create quiescence amongst the populace and their intent on maintaining status quo. An analysis of documents, reports, newspaper articles as well as interviews purposively sampled and conducted between June - September, 2015 in Uasin Gishu, Wajir, Nairobi and Trans-nzoia, and Kericho counties, have been used as sources of data. The paper concludes that the approach so far taken is compromised for elite motivated political purposes and may not foster reconciliation and build a stable Kenya. In so doing the paper contributes to intellectual debate around truth commissions and their role in promoting democracy.

M3 - Conference abstract in proceeding

BT - BSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy

ER -

Owiso M. A Critical View of Kenya´s Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Agenda. In BSU Seminar on Stability, Rights and Democracy. 2016