A Grammar of Praxis: an Exposé of "A New Logical Foundation for Psychology", a Few Additions, and Replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
199 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Taking departure in the author’s recent book “A New Logical Foundation for Psychology” the paper proposes a solution to the long-standing so-called crisis in psychology. The causes to this crisis are above all found in a ruling reductionist and mathematically supported mechanistic understanding of nature with roots in European Renaissance, and following that, of man’s embedment in nature. This leaves no place for non-mechanistic relations to unique and irreplaceable persons and objects defining the human psyche or soul, and fundamental phenomena as love and grief are consequently not understood. No humanistic superstructure of language or systems of signs and concepts can repair this loss of a vital dimension in basic human practical relations to the world. However, it is just in modern mathematics and mathematical logic, that the reductions of mechanicism are surmounted, at the same time leaving a place for mechanicism within a broader conceptual frame and defining a rich practical basis for understanding the role of language and human concepts. The wider perspectives comprise a new union of natural and human sciences. Finally the paper presents replies to two important commentaries to the author’s abovementioned book.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIntegrative Psychological and Behavioral Science (IPBS)
Volume53
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)223-237
ISSN1932-4502
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Affection
  • Axiom of choice
  • Axiomatic method
  • Cognition
  • Dualism
  • General psychology
  • Mathematical logic
  • Mechanicism
  • Sense categories and choice categories
  • Theory of sets
  • Topology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Grammar of Praxis: an Exposé of "A New Logical Foundation for Psychology", a Few Additions, and Replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this