A Map Enters the Conversation

Digital Cartography and its Different Modes of Mattering

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Over the past decade STS scholars have been engaged in a continuous dialogue about the performativity of their methods and the interventions of their research practices. A frequently posed question is how STS can make a difference to its fields of study, what John Law has called its different 'modes of mattering'. In this paper I explore what difference digital cartography can make to STS practice. I draw on three examples from my own work where digitally mediated maps have entered the conversation and made critical, often surprising, differences to the research process. In my first example the map is brought along as an ethnographic device on a piece of fieldwork, in my second example it serves as the central collaborative object in a participatory design project, and in my third example the map becomes the object of contestation as it finds itself centre stage in the controversy it was trying to chart. I use these examples to discuss the potential modes of mattering afforded by digital cartography in STS.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2014
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventEASST: Situating Solidarities: Social Challenges for Science and Technology Studies - Torun, Poland
Duration: 17 Sep 201419 Sep 2014
http://www.easst.umk.pl/

Conference

ConferenceEASST
CountryPoland
CityTorun
Period17/09/201419/09/2014
Internet address

Fingerprint

cartography
conversation
research practice
research process
field of study
dialogue
Law

Keywords

  • sts
  • intervention research
  • web cartography
  • digital methods
  • Digital Humanities
  • controversy mapping
  • issue mapping

Cite this

@conference{df4c3dcf95874b2bacc033ad28f5572a,
title = "A Map Enters the Conversation: Digital Cartography and its Different Modes of Mattering",
abstract = "Over the past decade STS scholars have been engaged in a continuous dialogue about the performativity of their methods and the interventions of their research practices. A frequently posed question is how STS can make a difference to its fields of study, what John Law has called its different 'modes of mattering'. In this paper I explore what difference digital cartography can make to STS practice. I draw on three examples from my own work where digitally mediated maps have entered the conversation and made critical, often surprising, differences to the research process. In my first example the map is brought along as an ethnographic device on a piece of fieldwork, in my second example it serves as the central collaborative object in a participatory design project, and in my third example the map becomes the object of contestation as it finds itself centre stage in the controversy it was trying to chart. I use these examples to discuss the potential modes of mattering afforded by digital cartography in STS.",
keywords = "sts, intervention research, web cartography, digital methods, Digital Humanities, controversy mapping, issue mapping",
author = "Munk, {Anders Kristian}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
note = "EASST : Situating Solidarities: Social Challenges for Science and Technology Studies ; Conference date: 17-09-2014 Through 19-09-2014",
url = "http://www.easst.umk.pl/",

}

A Map Enters the Conversation : Digital Cartography and its Different Modes of Mattering. / Munk, Anders Kristian.

2014. Abstract from EASST, Torun, Poland.

Research output: Contribution to conference without publisher/journalConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

TY - ABST

T1 - A Map Enters the Conversation

T2 - Digital Cartography and its Different Modes of Mattering

AU - Munk, Anders Kristian

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Over the past decade STS scholars have been engaged in a continuous dialogue about the performativity of their methods and the interventions of their research practices. A frequently posed question is how STS can make a difference to its fields of study, what John Law has called its different 'modes of mattering'. In this paper I explore what difference digital cartography can make to STS practice. I draw on three examples from my own work where digitally mediated maps have entered the conversation and made critical, often surprising, differences to the research process. In my first example the map is brought along as an ethnographic device on a piece of fieldwork, in my second example it serves as the central collaborative object in a participatory design project, and in my third example the map becomes the object of contestation as it finds itself centre stage in the controversy it was trying to chart. I use these examples to discuss the potential modes of mattering afforded by digital cartography in STS.

AB - Over the past decade STS scholars have been engaged in a continuous dialogue about the performativity of their methods and the interventions of their research practices. A frequently posed question is how STS can make a difference to its fields of study, what John Law has called its different 'modes of mattering'. In this paper I explore what difference digital cartography can make to STS practice. I draw on three examples from my own work where digitally mediated maps have entered the conversation and made critical, often surprising, differences to the research process. In my first example the map is brought along as an ethnographic device on a piece of fieldwork, in my second example it serves as the central collaborative object in a participatory design project, and in my third example the map becomes the object of contestation as it finds itself centre stage in the controversy it was trying to chart. I use these examples to discuss the potential modes of mattering afforded by digital cartography in STS.

KW - sts

KW - intervention research

KW - web cartography

KW - digital methods

KW - Digital Humanities

KW - controversy mapping

KW - issue mapping

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

ER -